Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CENSOR SAYS " NO "

"ALL QUIET" BANNED

BOARD UPHOLDS DECISION

Probably it was inevitable that the much discussed war story "All Quiet on the Western Front" would be filmed, and the screen version has apparently been a big success from a box office point of view in England, America, and Australia. But its exhibition in the Dominion is not to be allowed. The Government film censor, Mr. W. A. Tanner, recently ■yiewed tlio picture version of Unrique JSemarque's "best seller" in the ordinary course of his censoring duties, and he decided that it would nut bo in the best .interests of the people of the Dominion fov its exhibition to be allowed.

An appeal was lodged agaiiis* the Censor's decision, as provided for by the Act, and the Appeal Board yesterday, after viewing'the film, upheld the Censor's action. As the Appeal Board's decision is final, the film is now definitely banned.

Mr. Tanner told a. "Post" repreaeutative this morning that he was glad an appeal had been lodged, as he felt the responsibility of refusing a permit to such a picture. Sir lan Hamilton, he said, might be justified in his view that the film was a good bit of antiwar propaganda, but was the screen the right medium for such propaganda? If the screen was to be used for propaganda work, where should the line be drawn? Prohibitionists and others would • all want to use it to forward their causes.

"As fnr as 'All Quiet' is i-ou-oernccK/' said Mr. Tanner, "the New Zealand public are not deprived- of anything, for the book is not banned: from it they can get all they want. In Australia, I believe, the position, curiously enough, is reversed: the book is banned, but not the film." Mr. Tanner added that he recognised the fact that the film had a certain merit in its appe.'il for peace, but the film, as a whole, he thought, contained elements which it was not in the best interests of tho people of the Dominion to have thrust vividly before them.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19300712.2.82

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CX, Issue 11, 12 July 1930, Page 10

Word Count
341

CENSOR SAYS " NO " Evening Post, Volume CX, Issue 11, 12 July 1930, Page 10

CENSOR SAYS " NO " Evening Post, Volume CX, Issue 11, 12 July 1930, Page 10

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert