Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ELECTRICITY CHARGES

(To the Editor.)

Sir, —I think your correspondent, "A Square Deal," whose letter appeared in last Tuesday's issue of the "Evening Post," is deserving of the thanks of the community for his letter anent the City Council's charges for electricity. I quite agree with him that the present system is unjust. The Electric Light Department's official explanation is very lame; it is anything but convincing. The service in each case is undoubtedly the same, bo matter .whether the current supplied passes through a cooker, a radiator, or a light bulb; and, as the cost to the council is the same, there is no justification for one user being asked to pay half as much again as another. To say that, because very few protect* are received, the majority of users arc satisfied is a fallacy. It only goes to show, Sir, how long-suffering ire are. We take a lot lying down, either because we are too apathetic' or are afraid to raise our voices in protest against the powers that be; perhaps the majority fancy it is too much like flogging a dead horse—it would not get them anywhere. Now, Sir, as the cost of production to the council is the same, no matter for what purpose the current is supplied, what concern can it be of the council whether it is used for cooking or lighting? It would be good business oa the council's part to encourage the use of electricity in the home and leave it to the consumer to apply it to whatever purpose he likes. Thp" one sure way to encourage the use of electric cookers, which the council professes it wishes to do, is to make the price of current sufficiently attractive to induce the average householder to go to the initial expense of installing an electric range, which is no small item. I would throw out the suggestion that the council revert to the original initial charge of Od per unit and make the minimum rate the only rate, xegardless of the number of rooms in a person's house, with a reduced rate after a certain number of units have been consumed, but in Heaven's name let ifc be the same to everybody. This, lam certain, would popularise the use Of electric cookers and, naturally, increase the profits of the Electric Light Department, which are even now not inconsiderable.—l am, etc., OA TE 03? THE DISSATISFIED

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19270730.2.31

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CIV, Issue 26, 30 July 1927, Page 8

Word Count
404

ELECTRICITY CHARGES Evening Post, Volume CIV, Issue 26, 30 July 1927, Page 8

ELECTRICITY CHARGES Evening Post, Volume CIV, Issue 26, 30 July 1927, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert