Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

JUST BUTTLE FARM

BUT NOT SO,LITTLE AS IN 1925

BIGGEST-FARMS ALSO LESS,

'• In the "Statistical . Eeport on. the Agricultural^ and Pastoral Production of the Dominion of New Zealand," just issued by the Census and Statistics Office, the. 'Government Statistician' has: compiled "a volume of which eveiry farmer—in fact, every New Zealander —should buy a copy. It is informative, though in some placeE hard reading; at the Bame time not so hard M 'cross-word puzzles. ■■• ■ ' Under the-heading of "Sizes of Farms," the" Government Statistician shows that the average rural holding is 508.63 acres in-, extent.. The .difference between this and the :t925 average rural holding (507.49, acres) is slight. In a further table'it is shown that the number of holdings declined from 85,977 in 1925: to • 85,734 in 1926. Holdings from ten acres -up to 640 acres are tabulated .in si?: classes, ascording to size, and in overy class- the number of holdings is lessi in 1926 than in 1925. ' This indicates, a certain amount of aggregation. But at the top end of the scale—that is, among the largest holdings—there has also been adeclirie; holdings over 5000 acres are 12 less iii 1926 than in 1925, and that twelve implies that 133,443 \acres iof land has gone- into lower areaclasses* : : The net result of a reduction in the number of owners at both ends (the Kttle and the big) is an increase in the intermediate i area-classea. Hoi dings of 320 acres'-or less numbered 64,077 in 1926, as-against 64,358 in 1925, a decrease of 281; but holdings above 320 acres numbered 21,657 in 1926, against 21.619 in 1925, an increase of 38. The Government Statistician bums it up in this way: "The'decrease of 281 holdings of 320 acres or less is reflected in a decrease of 19,954 acres in the aggregate area of those holdings. The larger holdings, while iihowing an increase iii number of 38, reveal a docrease of 5589 acres in their aggregate area. ■' This is accounted for by the fact that the very large holdings (over 5000 acres) have decreased by 12, involving a decrease of ,183,443 acres.'-' The average farm is considerably smaller in the' North Island than in the South Islands- The-1 aroa of poor high country in the South makes this inevitable, though a, continuance of good farming in the South and bad farming (impoverishment of. pastures) in the North- might (lo something to redress tho balance, '■ particularly if :in the markets <>f tho world, sheep products wore to appreciate relatively to cow products. :

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19261216.2.49

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CXII, Issue 145, 16 December 1926, Page 9

Word Count
419

JUST BUTTLE FARM Evening Post, Volume CXII, Issue 145, 16 December 1926, Page 9

JUST BUTTLE FARM Evening Post, Volume CXII, Issue 145, 16 December 1926, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert