Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ART OR INDECENCY?

"It is at best an exceedingly trivial case," exclaimed Mr. A. H. Hindmarsh at the Magistrate's Court this afternoon, in applying for an adjournment in the case preferred against a Cubastveet art dealer named Solomon Gordon. Gordon is charged with having sold, and publicly exhibited, pictures alleged to be indecent.

Sub-Inspector M'Kinnon opposed the suggestion for an adjournment until after the vacation, and Mr. L. G. Reid, S.M., who was on the Bench, fixed the hearing for 2.30 p.m. to-morrow.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19161220.2.62

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume XCII, Issue 148, 20 December 1916, Page 8

Word Count
83

ART OR INDECENCY? Evening Post, Volume XCII, Issue 148, 20 December 1916, Page 8

ART OR INDECENCY? Evening Post, Volume XCII, Issue 148, 20 December 1916, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert