Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUPREME COURT.

DISPUTE OVER LAND SALE. Certain proceedings arising out of a verdict in a recent case respecting the sale of the Birch Hill estate were heard before his Honour Mr. Justice Chapman in Banco to-day. *, Frederick Hales, retired sheepfarmer, Wellington, and others, in the original case sued William Russell Deverea.ux, land agent, Christchurch, of the firm of Devereaux, King, and Co., of which W. R. Devereaux is managing director. (Plaintiffs claimed before Mr. justice Chapman and a jury for the return of a deposit of £500, alleged to have been paid to defendant as part purchase money for the Birch Hill estate. Defendant counterclaimed for £594 as commission on the sale in question. Counsel for plaintiffs asked for a nonsuit on the ground (inter alia) that Devereaux's misconduct precluded him from recovering any commission ; and he was estopped from setting up the sale to one Morland in view of the fact that there was a sale to one Somerville carried out at his express request. After hearing evidence, the court gave a verdict for defendant, and defendant's counsel moved for judgment with costs. Leave was granted plaintiffs (represented by Mr. A. Blair) to move for a new trial. Argument on the nonsuit point was reserved until to-day, when Mr. Blair moved for 'judgment for plaintiffs, or, in tie alternative, for a new trial, on the grounds that the verdict was against the weight of evidence. Defendant waa represented by Mr. T. Young, with him Mr. F. W. John-|-ston, Christchurch. After hearing argument, his Honour reserved decision.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19110306.2.95

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume LXXXI, Issue 54, 6 March 1911, Page 8

Word Count
257

SUPREME COURT. Evening Post, Volume LXXXI, Issue 54, 6 March 1911, Page 8

SUPREME COURT. Evening Post, Volume LXXXI, Issue 54, 6 March 1911, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert