LAWN TENNIS. SATURDAY'S COMPETITIONS.

Evening Post, Volume LXXV, Issue 34, 10 February 1908, Page 3

LAWN TENNIS. SATURDAY'S COMPETITIONS.

On Saturday tennis players had a fair day, and tho competitions went ahead bntkly. The following are details of the various contests. THE SHIELD. Wellington defeated Newtown by 12 sets to 1 Kit (102 games to 45). Peacock v. Morns, 9—l;9 — 1 ; J. S. Wilson v. F. P Wilson, 0—1; Brown \. Kedwiiul, 9—39 — 3 ; Green v. Brail&ford, 99 — 0 ; M 133 Travers v. Miss Glasgow, 7—4;7 — 4 ; Mif. Hickfon' v. Mis. Grady, V— s ; Peacock and Brown v. Morns and Red ward, 9—l ; ,AVilM>n and Jackson v. Wilson and Brailsford, 9—6;9 — 6 ; Giccn and Cookc v. Lowe and Thwaites, 9—7 ; Atiss Ward and Mrs. Hickson v Misses Glabgow and Robinson, 4" — 7; Misses' liavciib and Williams v. Mrs. Gv ~ly and Mrs. Lowe. 7—37 — 3 ; Jackson .and Miss Williams v. Mr. and Mrs Lowe, 7—2;7 — 2 ; Cooke and Miss Ward v. Thwaites and Mh& Kobinson, 7—2. ' Brougham Hill defeated Victoria College by 8 sets to 5 sets (96 games to 77 games): — Laifrhley r. Prome, 11 — 9; Young v. Beere, 9—49 — 4 ; Hunter v. Anderson, 9—39 — 3 ; Quinnell v. Putnam, 9—l9 — 1 ; Mrs. Goldie v. Miss Van Btavercn, 3—73 — 7 ; Miss Morgan v. Miss Robert.*,, 7—5;7 — 5 ; Ldishley and Young v. Prouse and Beero, 6—9;6 — 9 ; Hunter and Quinnell v. Anderson and Dc la Mere, 9—11;9 — 11 ; Howe and Veen v. Putnam and Smith, 9-^-5 ; Mesdame Goldio and Howe v. Misses Van Staveren and Roberts, 7—37 — 3 ; Misses Morgan and Murray x. Misses Scott and MTntosh, 7—5;7 — 5 ; Howe and Mrs. Howe v. De la Mere and Miss Scott, 4—7;4 — 7 ; Veen and Miss Murray v. Smith and Miss M'lntosh, 6—B.6 — 8. CUP. Nowtown defeated Victoria College by 10 sets to 3 gets (92 games to 66 gaino;. Sheppard v. Mansfield, 9—29 — 2 ; Grady v. Tudhope, 9—6;9 — 6 ; Murray v. Eichelbanni, 9—3 ; Powell v. Fair, 9—5 ; Miss Clark v. Mis& M'Kcllar, 7-^2; Miss K^dwaid v. Miss Atkinson, A — 7; Sheppard and Clrady v. ludhopo and Eichelbaum, 9—7;9 — 7; Muna.y and Powell v. Maus-ncld and Fair, 9— 7 ; Hursthouse -and Clark v. Smith • and Wilson, 3—9;3 — 9 ; Misses Clark and Rcdwaid v. Misses M'Kellar and Atkinson, 7—4;7 — 4 ; Misses Bock and M'Lean v. Misses Cooko and Newman, 3—7;3 — 7 ; Miss Bock and Hursthouse v. Miss Cooko and Wilson, 7—3; Miss M'Lean and Clark v. ( Miss Newman and Smith, 7—4. Khandallah dofeatcd Pctono by 10 : sets to i> (37 games to 59 games). — > Holdsworlh v. Hawkins, 7—9; Flcmi:v; ! v. Cornell, 7—9;7 — 9; Jones v. Wright, (( J—sJ — 5 ; j Mackay v. AuJ-tin, 9— h ; Miss Cock v. . Miss Penny, 7—l ; Miss Batham -\ . Mist. . Bennett, 7—27 — 2 ; Holdsworlh and Fleming I v. Hawkins and Cornell, 9—4;9 — 4 ; Jones ! and Piichardson v. Wright .and JDnniUn, 9—2;9 — 2 ; Mackay and Cockayne v Austin and Parfcjnro'n, 9—7; Misses Cook and Batham v. Miss Penny and Mis. Hawkins, 7—4 ; Miisor- lUchardson and Clark v. Misses Bennett and Carter, 7—3;7 — 3 ; llichardcuii and Miss Clark v. Parkinson and Mrs. Hawkins, 3—7; Cockayne and Miss l Richardson v. Duncan and Miss Carter, 7—2. Wellington defeated Brougham Hill I by 7 sets to 6 set? (77 gamfes to 84 j ga/nes) : — Fraser v. Howe, 4—9; Fernio v. Watkins, 3-— 9 ; M'Nicol v. Maddox, 2—9; Ward v. Marriner, 9—4; Mrs. Pierard v. Mrs. Howe, 7—l ; Miss Dijnant v. Mifs Archer, 7—6; Frase'r and Fernio v. Howe and Watkins, .5—3 ; M'Nicol and Ward v. MaddoM and Herd, 9—B:9 — 8 : M'Lean and Lawpon v. 'inrrinfcr and Sampson,' 9—7 ; Mrs. Pierard and Miss Dimant .y. Mrs. Bowo and, Mies Archer, 5—75 — 7 5 Mvs. Reaves and Miss Hannah v. Mrs, Burton and Miss Arthur, .7—2 ; M'Lean and Miss Hannah v. Herd and Mrs. Burton, b — 7 ; Lawson and Mrs. Reeves v. Sampson and Mils' Arthur, 7—6. PENNANT. Brougham Hill A defeated Brougham Hill B by 6 'sets to 1 set (59 games to 34 games) :-r-Lawrencc v. Edwards (latter retired at 5—2)5 — 2) ; Hurley v. Fell, 13—11, Roberts v Williams, 5—9 ; Miss Dempsey v. Misb^ Mitchenson, 7—2;7 — 2; Lawrence and Roberts v. Fell and Williams, 9—3; Micscs Dempsey and Chrirp v. Misses Mitchenson and Greenwood, 7—o; Hurley and Miss Chrhp v. Edwards and Miss Greenwood, 2—7. Victoria College B defeated Victoria College A by 4- &cts to 3 (44 games to 42 ■games): — Scantlebury v. Isaacs, 4—9;4 — 9; Griffiths v. laylor 4—9; Hogg Scott, 6—9;6 — 9 ; Scanllebury and Griffiths v. Isaacs and laylor, 9—4;9 — 4 ; Miss Taylor v. Miss Barkas, 7—47 — 4 ; Hogg and Miss Richa.rdeon v. Scott and Miss Stall, 7—6;7 — 6; Mi&sos Taylor and Richardson v. Misses Barkas. and Stace, 7—l.7 — 1. RACQUET. Brougham Hill A defeated Victoria College A by 7 &et:; to nil (57 games to 10) :— O'Leary v Duncan, 9—2 ; Eller v. pp O O p C) oo — 3 ; jjrindley v. Tudhope, G — 2 ; Mi?s Hogg v. Mifs'L. 1 M'lntcsh, 7—o; EUcr and "Brindley v. Duncan and Pope, 9—2 ; Misses Hogg and Saxon v, Misses M'lntosh and Still, 7—9; O'Leary and Miss Saxon v. Tudhope and Miss Still, 7—l. Kilbirnie defeated Muritai by 5 sets to 2 sets (41 games to 33 games): — Hutching 3v. Buddie, 4—94 — 9 ; Urosskcrry v P. Howden, 5—9 ; Dart v. Ho-vden, 9—6; Miss Price v. Miss Low, 7—2; Hutchings and Dart v. Howdon Bros., 9—4;9 — 4 ; Misses Price and AsquitH won by dcfanlt; Crosskerry and Miss Asquith v Buddie and Miss. Low, 7—3.7 — 3. Brougham Hill B defeated Victoria College B by 7 sets to nil (57 games to 12 game?): — Morrison v. Bogle, 9—l;9 — 1; Urcn v. Hogbt-n, 9—l;9 — 1 ; Arden v. Stockcr, C—l;C — 1; Miss ll arrow by v. Miss Mason, 7—3;7 — 3; Monibon and Urcn v. BogLo and Hoglsen, 9—2; Arden and Mis.s M. Hairowby v. Stocker and Miss Martin, 7—2;7 — 2; Misses A. and M Hai-rowby v. Misses Mason and Martin, 7—2.7 — 2.