Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

FEDERAL HIGH COURT.

RECENT DECISIONS CRITICISED. [PBKSS ASSOCIATION.] (Received July 19, 10.30 a.m.) MELBOURNE, This Day. Mr. Justice Hodges, Judge of the Victorian Supreme Court, passed some strong comments on recent High Court decisions, which, he said, compelled him to give a. judgment at variance with the law as it had been interpreted by the Victorian Judges. The plaintiff, in the present case, would appeal to the Privy Council, whioh would mean an indirect appeal against the decision of the High Court, and made over the head of that tribunal. His Honour said he feared the present methods would bring the administration of the law into confusion. They ought either to have a High Court altogether or a Prdvy Council altogether.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19050719.2.41

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume LXX, Issue 16, 19 July 1905, Page 5

Word Count
121

FEDERAL HIGH COURT. Evening Post, Volume LXX, Issue 16, 19 July 1905, Page 5

FEDERAL HIGH COURT. Evening Post, Volume LXX, Issue 16, 19 July 1905, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert