Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE LEONID METEOR RING.

The November Meteors, as the Leonidr are sometimes called, do not seem to Jiavr been observed in greater number in America than in England, which favours the conclusion that the shower was really no greater or more brilliant than in ordinary years, though the period of maximum is now so near. Mr. Denning, the meteor expert, thinks the earth is still too far in advance of the cometary mass, but thai the thinness of that part of the ring through which we recently passed is no reason why we should not expect this year, or the next again, a renewal of the brilliant displays witnessed in 1833 and 1866. As the comet's period is rather more than 33 years, 1900 is more likely to be the maximum year than 1899.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP18990128.2.116

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume LVII, Issue 23, 28 January 1899, Page 4 (Supplement)

Word Count
134

THE LEONID METEOR RING. Evening Post, Volume LVII, Issue 23, 28 January 1899, Page 4 (Supplement)

THE LEONID METEOR RING. Evening Post, Volume LVII, Issue 23, 28 January 1899, Page 4 (Supplement)

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert