SUPREME COURT.
Yestebdat. (Before his Honour Mr. Justice Richmond.) GEO. GEOKGESON V. JOE DRANSPIELD, I. PLIMMEB AND P. HOLMES. Evidence in this ca°e was concluded after we went to press. Mr. Travera, in addressing the jury, contended that there was no proof that the mishap occurred through negligence. Mr. t^haw replied, and his Honor having summed up, tho jury returned a verdict in favour of plaintiff for .£IOO. OTHER CASES. Tho actions Gill v. Taylor and Phillips v. Feist were withdrawn, and the case Hilly. Cockburne was postponed till next sittings of the Court.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP18811018.2.12
Bibliographic details
Evening Post, Volume XXII, Issue 93, 18 October 1881, Page 2
Word Count
94SUPREME COURT. Evening Post, Volume XXII, Issue 93, 18 October 1881, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in