Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MRS. DEWAR’S STORY

No Problem Until Mrs. Freer Came on Scene LETTER FROM HUSBAND By Telegraph—Press Assn. —Copyright. (Received November 18, 10.55 p.m.) Melbourne, November 18. Mrs. Dewar, wife of Lieutenant R. Dewar, specially interviewed on the Fiver case, said the first step taken was when she showed the military authorities a lot ler from her husband In India in which lie declared he would not return alone from India, as be bad found complete happiness. Mrs. Dewar added: “1 understand that the authorities made inquiries about Mrs. Freer, and apparently had very good reasons for excluding her. I do not wish to make plausible and pathetic attempts to gain public sympathy, and would haw preferred to be left alone to solve our own problems, which did not exist until Mrs. Freer met my husband.” Mrs. Dewar and her two-year-old daughter are residing with her parents at Caulfield. "After my husband returned to Australia,” said Mrs. Dewar, “he asked me for a divorce. I was not anxious to make it easier for Mrs. Freer if she did wriggle into this country. I felt that my husband’s infatuation would abate when he settled down in his former environment and that he would possibly realise that he had made a mistake.” HUSBAND’S VERSION Says There is No Scandal Sydney, November 18. The statement of the Minister of the Interior, Mr. T. Paterson, regarding the identity of Mrs. Freer was in answer to a letter written to him by Lieutenant Dewar in defence of Mrs. Freer, in which he suggested that there might have been a mistake in identity, pointing out that there were two Mrs. Freere in Bombay. Lieutenant Dewar in his letter to Mr. Paterson set out “that there is no scandal in my friendship with Mrs. Freer in India,” and that “the marriage you so strongly defend was not a success for various reasons. The marriage would have peen ended suddenly in any case. T.ae banning of Mrs. Freer has in no way helped the situation: in fact it has had the opposite effect.” CABLE TO DOMINIONS OFFICE (Received November 19, 2 a.m.) London, November 18. The Dominions Office has received a cable from the Commonwealth of Australia asking for all available information concerning Mrs. Freer. No further information is available concerning inquiries by the Secretary for the Dominions, Mr. Malcolm MacDonald. Official quarters are reticent..

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19361119.2.107

Bibliographic details

Dominion, Volume 30, Issue 47, 19 November 1936, Page 11

Word Count
396

MRS. DEWAR’S STORY Dominion, Volume 30, Issue 47, 19 November 1936, Page 11

MRS. DEWAR’S STORY Dominion, Volume 30, Issue 47, 19 November 1936, Page 11

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert