Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

FRUIT FOR CHILDREN

There is a growing opinion that milk puddings are too starchy to be of bodybuilding value; that their pappiuess is bad for the teeth. Soft puddings can be given occasionally, and a milk pudding made with a pint of milk and a good lump of butter has much to recommend it. But the child’s second course should often consist of some harder food which makes the teetli do their work. The stomach should not always, after the first course, lie tilled with soft and moist milk pudding. This is not good for the digestion. The second course should sometimes be one of fresh fruit —an apple or an orange. Nuts, to be well masticated, can be given. Even suet pudding is coming in for criticism these days. Good as suet is for a child, it is not recommended more than once a week

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19340319.2.24.4

Bibliographic details

Dominion, Volume 27, Issue 147, 19 March 1934, Page 5

Word Count
146

FRUIT FOR CHILDREN Dominion, Volume 27, Issue 147, 19 March 1934, Page 5

FRUIT FOR CHILDREN Dominion, Volume 27, Issue 147, 19 March 1934, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert