Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

“WHAT A WORLD!”

Mr. G. B. Shaw and Rights of Women REPLY TO INVITATION By Telegraph.—Press Assn. —Copyright. London, November 2. A typical breezy correspondence has been published in which Mr. Bernard Shaw refuses to attend a meeting at Westminster to deal with the question “Should married women earn?” Mr. Shaw’s letter to Mrs. Pethick Lawrence says: “Nothing will induce me to speak at a meeting to demand rights for women. I have lost no opportunity of giving the cause a lift with my writings. Personal vanity will not allow me to be led in triumph by eloquent militant women, and exhibited peeping behind their skirts to speak out a little piece in favour of this or that concession, and then be patted on the head as a good little knight errant and sent home to bed. A pretty picture I would cut at seventy-seven demanding rights for married women. Besides the significance of the meeting would be entirely spoiled by the crowd that follows me everywhere, not caring two straws whether I am advocating purdah or promiscuity.” Mr. Shaw goes on to argue that much more important than adult suffrage was his earlier advocacy that there should be a proportion of women in every governing body. “Don’t Mussolini. Hitler, and Company make you think occasionally that I was right? We have now the spectacle of women’s votes keeping women out of Parliament. and the negro Republic of Liberia reviving the slave trade. What a world I” A “PEPPERY” POSTCARD Why he sent “a peppery postcard” to officials of the World Committee for the Relief of Victims of German Fascism was explained by Mr. G. Bernard Shaw recently. He said :— “People here get into a state of political agitation and take up the case of some prisoner or other accused by a foreign Government, and without the slightest consideration of the fact that they are damaging the unfortunate prisoner—never considering the effect of their proceedings on the prisoner in question. “Take tlie case of Sacco and Vanzetti. Any chance they had of not being electrocuted was cut off by foreign agitation got up denouncing American justice and that kind of thing. “A man named Mooney has been for many years in prison in America, and I dare say would have been let out long ago had he not been used as a stick to beat the American Government with. “Take the case, again, of the Russian engineers. Our agitation was ridiculous. We had no right to do it. Yet the people who took up that point of view most strongly are doing the very same thing in the case of these unfortunate Leipzig prisoners If we had anything to say we should wait until they have had their trial. Continually using these unfortunate prisoners abroad as a stick with which to beat a Government seems to be cruel and inconsiderate.”

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19331104.2.77

Bibliographic details

Dominion, Volume 27, Issue 35, 4 November 1933, Page 7

Word Count
480

“WHAT A WORLD!” Dominion, Volume 27, Issue 35, 4 November 1933, Page 7

“WHAT A WORLD!” Dominion, Volume 27, Issue 35, 4 November 1933, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert