University Debates
Sir,—l think that most thoughtful people will rend with dissatisfaction the report of the committee o£ the council vt Victoria University College on recent discussions by students. So far as the recommendations refer to moral and political questions one can have little comment to make. The advocacy of anarchical or revolutionary political principles, :n a country where there exist adequate laeilities for political redress cannot be defended ; and that the council should safeguard ns far as it is able the morals of the students is equally unqucrtionab*e. But one would like to know on what ground the council will presume to question the suitability of subjects for debates on religious questions. . I believe that a civilisation without an essentially religious basis is in a precarious position, but history has yet to show that regulation by authority is the best means to achieve that end. In the rear in which we celebrate the centenary of Charles Bradlaugh's birth, surely the principles of religious freedom should he observed in other than a lip-serving manner- If religious discussions cause trouble, let nil be prohibited or none. All our laws and traditions are hostile to the claim that any public body can lay down standards’ of religious truth. —I am, CtC " w. J. McELDOWNEY. Wellington, November 1:
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19331102.2.144.1
Bibliographic details
Dominion, Volume 27, Issue 33, 2 November 1933, Page 13
Word Count
215University Debates Dominion, Volume 27, Issue 33, 2 November 1933, Page 13
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.