Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LOWER HUTT COURT

By-law and Civil Cases Tuesday's sitting of the Lower Hutt Magistrate’s Court was presided over by Messrs. G. A. Chapman and F. Feist, J.P.’s, when by-law and civil cases were dealt with. By-Law Coses. For riding a bicycle at night without ! lights, Clifford Hoare was fined 10/- ami costs 15/-. M. Magnus, for driving a motor-car on the main road at a greater speed than, 25 miles an hour, was fined £2 and costs 15/-. Kidijjg a bicycle In High Street without a'light cost Fred Hayes 10/- and costs 17/-. A. Wilson, for riding a bicycle on the bitumen track road in High Street, was fined 10/- and costs 17/-. C. Brice, for riding a bicyclo in High Street without a light, was lined 10/- and costs 17/-. Riding his bicycle on the bitumen track in High Street cost W. 11. Barker court costs 12/-. For riding a bicycle in High Street without a light, F. K. Craven was fined 10/and costs 16/-. For riding a bicycle on the Cuba Street ramp without u light Clement Green was lined 10/- and costs 15/-. Robert Asken, for riding a bicycle on the Main Road, Lower Hutt, without a light, was fined .10/- and costs 17/-. Riding a bicycle in Connolly Street without a light cost Vincent Searlo 15/- and costs 16/-. Robert 8. Muirhead, for riding a bicyclo on the main road without a light, was fined 10/- and costs 17/-. Peter Poli was fined 10/- and costs 16/for riding a bicycle on the main road without a light. For riding a bicycle on the bitumen

road track on the main street., Patrick Rea was ordered to pay court costs 10/-. For riding at night without a light be was fined 5/- and costs 15/-. Peter M. Moran, who rode a bicycle In Knight’s Road without a light, was lined 10/- and costs 16/-. Reginald Baker, who rode a motor-cycle on the main road at a speed of 48 miles an hour, was fined £4 and costs 15/-. W. Hart, who rode a bicycle on the old bridge without a light, was fined 15/- and costs 15/-. F. L.' Laurenson, who obstructed the traffic inspector by parking his car in the prohibited area in Fraser Street when warned not to do so, was fined 80/- and costs 15/-. Vivian George Cottle, for driving a motor truck in the main street at a greater speed than 20 miles an hour, was fined £1 and costs 17/-. .. . Riding a bicycle in Railway Avenue without a light cost A. Stopworth 10/- and costs 15/-. . „ T j For a similar oftence A. E. Mclndoe was fined 10/- and costs 15/-. VV. S. Holgate, who rode a bicycle on the bitumen road track in Railway Avenue, was fined 10/- and costs 16/-. ”• iVright was fined 10/- and costs 10/- for a similar offence. . , , For riding a bicvcle on the new bridge without a light E. McSherry was lined 10/and costs 15/-. Civil Casos. Judgment for plaintiff by default was given in the following undefended civil cases:— Bernard John Dudley v. N. H. Langdon, £5/8/-, costs £l/14/6; Lower Hint Borough Council -v. M. Sullivan (separate estate), £lO/0/5, costs -A/18/-; A. .E. Parkin v. T. N. Hall. £l/0/3, costs 10/-, A. E. Parkin v. G. Thompson, 10/-, costs 12/-: W. Moss and Co. v. J. Mhittaaer, , £2/9/3, costs £l/4/6; S A. Barnard v. T. Mclvor. £l/4/-, costs 9/-; Ward and Rawusley, Etd. v. Smith, .-11/-/ » OA ctc £2/15/-: W. J. P. Dicks v. D. MeEwen, 10/-. costs 9/-: T. Waugh and Son v. H. G. Nickols, £3/10/2, costs £l/6/6, Lockheed. Ltd. v. H. McDonald, £3/14/6, costs £l/4/6; Ward and Rawusley, Ltd. v. M. von Zedlitz, £3/3/3, costs £l/3/6, Sid ney and Vivian Clanton v. L. M 14/-, costs 9/-; W. G. Hutchison v. W. A. Kose, £3/10/6, costs £?/3/6: Cook and Cook v. J. H. Johnson, £3/14/9, ?y s ts £VO/6, I • U. Shearer, Ltd. v. J. Clegg, £3/14/11, costs £l/4/6: Thomas W. felinn y. R. K lte > £4/12/5, costs £l/4/6: Lower Hutt Borough Council v. D. W. R. Smith anid J. £ Smith (separate estate), £B/18/1, costs £1 17/6.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19300725.2.43

Bibliographic details

Dominion, Volume 23, Issue 256, 25 July 1930, Page 5

Word Count
694

LOWER HUTT COURT Dominion, Volume 23, Issue 256, 25 July 1930, Page 5

LOWER HUTT COURT Dominion, Volume 23, Issue 256, 25 July 1930, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert