Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

FILMING WAR SCENE

CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FOR INJURIES BY AUSTRALIAN VICTORIA CROSS WINNER (Australian Press Association.) London, November 19. In the Court of King's Bench, the Australian Victoria Cross winner, Lieutenant Leonard Keysor, sued the film producer G. B. Samuelson for damages for injuries received in filming a re-enactment of the Gallipoli bombing episode for which the plaintiff was decorated. The plaintiff’s case was that in consideration of £75 a week he went to the studio at Isleworth. Smoke bombs and gunpowder were used in the reproduction of the trench scene. He alleges that the bombs were carelessly thrown and the electrical discharge of the gunpowder faulty, with the result that a bomb and also gunpowder exploded in his face and fractured his jaw. A hundred incised wounds were left in his forearm, and fifty wounds in his knee. He was confined to bed for five and a half weeks, and his jaw, despite operations, was permanently disfigured. In cross-examination, Lieutenant Keysor denied that he had not told Mr. Samuelson about the sandbag portion of the episode. “Samuelson,” he said, “told me a lot of things I did to get the Victoria Cross, but I hadn’t done them at all.” (Laughter.) He said that the doctor ordered him to Monaco, which was very quiet. Mr. Beyfus (for the defence) : I suppose you went across the border to Monte Carlo? Lieutenant Keysor: Oh, yes. Mr. Justice Horridge: I don’t think yon need pursue that. Keysor admitted that he did not know that the cardboard jam-tin bombs were empty with a small piece of fuse attached.

Mr. Beyfus: I suggest that not one of the bombs exploded. Lieutenant Keysor: There was a certain amount of smoke. Something exploded when I threw them back. The defendant, in his evidence, said that he included the sandbag after Lieutenant Keysor told him of it. It was not the case that the signal for firing the charge was the dropping of n sandbag. The scheme was as safe as it could be in a war film. The case was adjourned.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19281121.2.59

Bibliographic details

Dominion, Volume 22, Issue 49, 21 November 1928, Page 11

Word Count
344

FILMING WAR SCENE Dominion, Volume 22, Issue 49, 21 November 1928, Page 11

FILMING WAR SCENE Dominion, Volume 22, Issue 49, 21 November 1928, Page 11

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert