Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

OIL DISPUTES

BETWEEN UNITED STATES AND MEXICO SENATE FAVOURS ARBITRATION By Telegraph.—Press association. Copyright. Washington, January 21. Arbitration with Mexico over oil disputes was brought appreciably nearer when the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, by a vote of 13 to 3, decided to ‘report to the Senate a modified resolution expressing the opinion that the Administration should accept arbitration of the disputes. Senator Borah, Chairman of the Committee, declared that the resolution would be brought before the Senate on January 24. The overwhelming vote in favour of reporting the resolution practically assures its adoption. The resolution, primarily introduced by Senator Robinson, as it now stands merely expresses the opinion of the Senate that arbitration should be resorted to; also it indicates a means whereby it could be effected, which, in conjunction with Mr. FraTik Kellogg’s (the Secretary of State) recent attitude, is expected to assure an amicable settlement. PRESIDENT OPPOSED TO ARBITRATION (Rec. January 23, 5.5 p.m.) Washington, January 21. President Coolidge has intimated that he is oposed to arbitration with Mexico, despite the Senate, Committee’s resolution to that effect. He believes that if the public understood what the United States is contending for, viz., the inviolability of property rights, while 'Mexico is for confiscation, there would be no demand for arbitration. He feels, however, that the Senate resolution will perhaps complicate the situation. [A message from Mexico City published in Saturday’s issue stated that, according to a Foreign Office announcement, the Government accepted in principle arbitration on its differences with the United States.]

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19270124.2.58

Bibliographic details

Dominion, Volume 20, Issue 101, 24 January 1927, Page 11

Word Count
253

OIL DISPUTES Dominion, Volume 20, Issue 101, 24 January 1927, Page 11

OIL DISPUTES Dominion, Volume 20, Issue 101, 24 January 1927, Page 11

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert