DAIRY PRODUCE CONTROL
(To the Editor)
Sir—l was naturally interest*• lette; signed H C Cameron c-f London, “r a Eve g ™no J who know? Mr Cameron is aware of his interest in and ent iutDominion. ' OmmisGeoTKe a ßovlo*. a»<l Co-, dairy Hive it was handled Batlstnc t or,1 \Vhou the rairy companies concerned. M hen the Dai?v Board undertook to allocate the outputs of dairy companies to the merchants it made an allocatwm to George Bowles. Nicholls and Go. considerably greater than the average handled bv them for the three years taken as a basis of allocation. The board, however, allocated complete cutputs. instead of a small proportion of a number of outputs as previouHy handled by this firm. This was. of course, to recluce the amount of work end expense entailed. The advantage and goodwill referred to by Mr. Cameron, as related tn the ouantity handled by George Bowles, Nicholls and Go., is still retained for the industry. The only difference is that the whole industry benefits, and not onlv the favoured few, as the results of sales are pooled according to grade.-I am, etc., t c br ash Secretary. Dairy Board. September 28.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19260929.2.120
Bibliographic details
Dominion, Volume 19, Issue 312, 29 September 1926, Page 12
Word Count
196DAIRY PRODUCE CONTROL Dominion, Volume 19, Issue 312, 29 September 1926, Page 12
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in