THE NASH CASE
WIFE INTENDS TO APPEAL. The Nash case came before Mr. Justice MacGregor in the Supreme Court yesterday by way of a summons for security of the wife’s costs of appeal, and also a motion to dispense with the necessity for the wife finding security for her husband’s costs. Mr. D. R. Hoggard, who appeared for the husband (William Henry Nash) said that respondent (Mary Maud Nash) had given notice of appeal against the decision of the Full Court. His Honour said he knew nothing about the case. . Mr. G. Toogood said that the hull Court had dismissed a motion for a new trial, and his client was now desirous of going to thp Court of ApHis Honour suggested that the matter should be taken by a Judge who was familiar with the case. Counsel eventually agreed to extend the time for giving security to six weeks.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19231130.2.109
Bibliographic details
Dominion, Volume 18, Issue 56, 30 November 1923, Page 10
Word Count
149THE NASH CASE Dominion, Volume 18, Issue 56, 30 November 1923, Page 10
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in