Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SHIPPING PRODUCE

INDEPENDENT LINE SUGGESTED

DAIRY ASSOCIATION TAKES ACTION

Ip; By Telegraph—Special Reporter. ' ■ Palmerston North, June 22. i;£ : Tito question of shipping was discussed at considerable length by the conference ffS of the National Dairy Association tof ':- day, when Mr. TV. D. Forsythe (Eltham) proposed a motion urging "that the time Has arrived when the Dominion producers should,. along with our Government. ; have a controlling interest in the fleet > for the carriage of our produce, nnd that it be a- recommendation to the executive of the'association to co-operate.with the I South Island Dairy Association, also with p.. 'wooJ;•••meat,''and other producers, to approach the Government, with' a view to if: ■ getting financial assistance or baching; and legislation .providing for a lovy on i.:- 1 • all exports to provide funds for the pur- ' pose of obtaining an assurod and reli-' ||>"..Vttble slipping service at reasonable rates g.- v of freight, or establishing an Independent j' . -shining lino if such becomes'necessary f- i The mover estimated that on the basis ef thirty millions a tax of one per cfent. t' would produce a tax of 2 per &F : cent .{600,000, and a 1 tax of 21 per cent. V .£"50,000. <■ ~ Mr. W. D. Powdr'ell, in seconding tte : motion, pointed'to the.success of the GisA borne farmers' soheme in purchasing l a 7 cargoliner, which ;had earned £29,000 in freijht on a hardwood cargo from Aust tralia on its,initial trip to New Zealand. ■ ' Tho freight on the steamer's run Home i' r was estimated to produce ,£90,000. .'. ■ ' iv .. A Vicious System. k:' ;•. -Various speakers supported the project, i. . ■ Objection , was raised by Mr." Moss 0 ■ (EketahunaV to. introducing the vicious f., - /.system'of'taxing tho producers. Once a f; ■ levy was imposed.it would bo very hard to get- it removed. The'burden should > not all be placed on tho prodilcors, If ; the factories would' amalgamate, as the .'o Gisborne farmers had done, they would ■ have no need to run to th« Government £. ■ for assistance. < In the course of a general discussion r: ' the opinion was expressed that the proposal as it stood- was too cumbersome. There was unanimity of opinion that aV ■ some measure of control of shipping > ./; should be obtained in the. interests of the producers, but that if the Governor' 1 • ment were asked to bear.the lion's share ? • the scheme would break down of its own ■ V ; weight. • Mr. MTarlano pointed out that the fc'c Shipping Eing was such a strong corpora- !' tion that the producers would shortly j feel the effect of its. operations.' The ttime for Government moving in the matter bad passed.- The dairy producers j.' : - should combine with tho wool producers s';'- and freezing companies in the matter., S . * Mr. Maxwell (Taranaki) said that once i; - the principle of an export ..tax was inv: it would lie made to apply to . many things.'. It'-was ridiculous for the i.'V':" producers to imagine that an. export tax f . : . would bo confined to the proposed levy. Ho also raised the question whether producers.were really exporters. Would '. theynot be crowded out in the scheme 1 by proprietary interests? Others than r: producers would, hold the control of ; . , shipping. . . "Nobody Wants to Pay." f According to .Mjr. Powdrell, almost everyone in the room was in favour of • tho scheme, but nobody wanted to pay ■ : for it. Cries of "Hear, hears," and "That's the j : . . . stuff to give jihem." • Mr. Powdrell said that if the produc- : - . ers pledged, say, a halfpenny in the t. . pound on their produce, they, would re|V ' coup the outlay, in the saving effected in freights. V; - ; Mr." Wright said that hitherto the op- : ■ ponents of a producers' shipping line were the proprietary freezing companira. These companies were being financed from America, and the could prove it. intimately Ithe. motion was carried ! ' unanimously, after being amended by ir the deletion of all reference to a tax or !;/) ' levy and the addition of a recommenda- {.••• • tion _ "that some scheme be devised to i : ■;'provide the necessary funds."

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19200623.2.66

Bibliographic details

Dominion, Volume 13, Issue 230, 23 June 1920, Page 8

Word Count
662

SHIPPING PRODUCE Dominion, Volume 13, Issue 230, 23 June 1920, Page 8

SHIPPING PRODUCE Dominion, Volume 13, Issue 230, 23 June 1920, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert