HOCKEY.

Dominion, Volume 4, Issue 1109, 24 April 1911, Page 2

HOCKEY.

DRAWING FOR THE FIRST ROUND, AND PRACTICE GAMES. The following ar ctho drawings for tha. first round of this winter's hockey:— Senior Matches, April 29-Vmted v. Wesley, at Day's l»ny, No. 1; Wellington v. Karori, at Karon, No. 5; Victoria College, v. 1.M.C.A., at Day's Bay, No. 3. jM/'.v 6.—United v. Karori, at Karori; Wellington v. Victoria College, at Day's Bay, No. 3 ; Wesley v. Y.M.C.A., at Day's Bay, No. 1. May 13.-United v. Victoria College, atTV I , 3ay, No - 3 i Wellington v. Y.M.C.A.. at Days Bay, No. 1; Karovi v. Wesley, at Karon. May 20,-Unitpd v. Wellington, at Day's Buy, i\o. 1; Victoria College v. Wesley, Bny"No Mi 3" " V " Y ' M,C>A - at D3 > * Well?; 2?"~ Uni nJ 1 T- Y -' M - C - A - «t Karori; \\clhngton v Wesley, at Day's Bav, No. Bay No™ B ° V> Katori, at ~Vw'<> Junior Matches. Si X lo W ,lan v - St. "ark's, a< m™ No T "V" Well > n ßton. at *Mir* May O.—Y.M.C.A. v. St. Mirk's it Day s Bay, No 2; Government Insurance v, United, at Day's Bay, No. 4; Weslev v. Gregg s, at Duppa Street; Victoria Colv go A -\;,X, 1 ? to r la Collp S° B - at Miramar, No. 3; Wellington v. Hutt, at Basin Reserve. May 13.-Y.M.C.A. v. Karori, at Day's Bay, No. 2; Metropolitan v. United,'at Hays Bay, No. 4; Government Insurance v. Gregg's, at Basin Reserve; Wesley v. Victoria College B, at Miramar, No. 3; Victoria College A v. Wellington, at Karori, No. 4; Hutt v. St. Mark's, at Duppa Street. Maj-20.-Y.M.C.A. v. United, at Day'a my, Jvo. 4; Metropolitan v. Gregg's, at Dnpp.i Street; Government Insurance v. Victoria College B, at Miramar, No. 3; Wesley v.- Victoria, College A, at Day's Bay, No. 2; Wellington v. St. Mark's, at Karon, No. 4; Hutt v. Karori, at Basin Reserve. , ■ ■ ■ May 27.-Y.M.C.A. v. Gregg's, at Dupna street; Mctrcpjlitan v. Victoria Collojeß at Miramar, No. 3; Government Insurance v. Victoria College A, at Day's Bay, No. 2; Wesley v. Wellington, at Day's Bay, No. 4; United v. Hutt, at Basin Reserve; Karori v. St. Mark's, at Karori. June 3—Y.M.C.A. v. Victoria College B, at Miramar, No. 3; Metropolitan v. Victoria College A, at Day's Bay, No. 2; Government Insurance v. Wesley, at Karori, No. 4; Gregg's v. Hutt, at Basin Reserve; United v. St. Mark's, at Day's Bay, No. i; Karori v. Wellington, at Duppa Street. Juno 10.-Y.M.C.A. v. Victoria College A,, at Basin Reserve; Metropolitan v. Wesley, at Karori, No. 4; Government Insurance v. Wellington, at Day's Bay, No. 2; Hutt v. Victoria College B, at Duppa Street; Gregg's v. St. Murk's, at Miramar, No. 3; United v. Karori, at Day's Bay, No. 4. _Juno 17.—Y.M.C.A. v. Wesley, at' Karori, No. 4; Metropolitan v. Government Insurance, at Day's Bay, No. 2; Victoria Vollene A v. Hu'tt, at Duppa Street; Victoria College B v. St. Mark's, at Day's Bay, No. i; Gregg's v. Karori, at Itiramar, No. 3; United v. Wellington, at Basin Reserve. June 24.—Y.M.C.A. v. Government Insurance, at Day's Bay, No. 2; Metropolitan v. Wellington, at Day's Bay, No. 4; nesley v. Hutt, at Duppa Street; Victoria College A v. St. Mark's, at Miramar,. No. 3; Victoria College B v. Karori, at Basin Reserve; Gregg's United, at Karori, No. 4. . v. Metropolitan, at' Days Bay, No. 4; Government Insurance v. Hutt,,at Duppa.Street; Wesley v. St. : Mark's,'at Miramar, No. 3; Victoria Col-lege-A. v. Karori, at Basin Reserve; Victoria College By. United, at Karori, No. h Gregg's v. Wellington, at Day's Bay, July 8.-Y.M.C.A. v. Dellington, at Miramar, No. 3; Metropolitan v. Hutt, at Basin ivjserve; Government Insurance v. St. Mark's, at Duppa Street; Wesley v. Karori, at Karori, No. 4; Victoria Collego A v. United, at Day's Bay, No. 2; Victoria College B v. Gregg's, at Day'a Bay, No. i. Third-class Matches, April. 29.—Metropolitan v. St. Mark's, at Miramar, No. 1; Government Insurance v. Wellington, at Day's Bay, No. 5; Wesley v. Gregg's, at Miramar, No, 2; Victoria College v. Hutt, at Hutt. May 6.—Metropolitan v. Wellington, at Day's Bay, No. 5; Government Insurance v. Gregg's, at Miramar, No. 2; Wesley v.. Victoria College, at Miriiniar, No. 1; St. Mark's v. Hutt, at Hutt. May 13.—Metropolitan v. Gregg's, at Miramar, No. 2; Government Insurance v. Victoria College, at Miramar, No. 1; Wesley v. Hutt, at Hutt; Wellington v. •St. Mark's, at Day's Bay, No. 5. May 20.—Metropolitan v. Victoria Coliege, at Miramar, No. 1; Government Insurance v. Wefley, at Day's Bay, No. 5; Gregg's v. St. Mark's, at Miramar, No. 2; Wellington v. Hutt, at Hutt. May 27.— Metropolitan v. Wesley, at Day's Bay, No. 5; Government Insurance v. Hutt, nt Hutt; Victoria College v. St. Mark's, at Miramar, No. 2; Gregg's v. Wellington, at Miramar, No. 1. June 3.—Metropolitan v. Government Insurance, at Miramar, No, 2; Wesley v. St. Mark's, at Miramar, No. 1; Victoria Collego v. Wellington, at Day's Bay, No. 5; Gregg's v. Hutt, at Hutt. June 10.— Metropolitan v. Hutt, at Hutt; Government Insurance v. St. Mark's, at Miramar, No. 1; Wesley v. Wellington, at Day's Bay, No. 5; Victoria Collego v> Gregg's, nt Mirnmar, No. 2. Practice Games, City clubs made good use of the last Saturday available for practice preparatory to the opening of the season. Each club was allotted a ground, and fair form was shown in some cases. The grounds, excepting tho Basin Hcserve; are in good order, and some fairly fast play should eventuate on Saturday next. The Dominion - will be glad to receive, reports of junior and third-class matches each Saturday.