LAWN TENNIS.

Dominion, Volume 4, Issue 961, 31 October 1910, Page 5

LAWN TENNIS.

SATURDAY'S MATCHES. MEN'S COMPETITION—A GRADE. Brougham Hill defeated Hutt by 3 rubbers to 3, 7 sets to 6, 75 games to 61. Laisbley v. Hawkins', 4—6, 5—6; H. V. Hove v. Cornell, 4 —6, 6 —4, 5—6; Hunter v-. Ward, 6—4, 6—3; J. A. B. Howe v. .Callcnder, 6—5, 6 —4; Laisliley and Huntor v. Cornell and Ward, 2—6, 3—6; Howe brothers v. Hawkins and Callender, 6 —5,' 6 —o. Thorndon defeated Muritai by 5 rubbers to 1, 10 sets to 2, 66 games to 37. Swanston v. Nagle, 6—l, 6 —l; Peacock v. Wright, 6—2, 6—l; Carter v. Lewis, 6—o, 6—5; Putnam v. Jones, 6—4, 6—3; Swanston and Peacock v. Nagle and; Lewis, 6—5, 6—3; Carter and Putman v. Wright and Jones, .4-6, 2-6. Victoria College defeated Wellington II by 5 rubbers to 1, 10 sets to 3, 73 games to 46. F. P. Wilson v. Eller, 6—4, -6—5; Bcere v.. Jeffrey, 6—4, 6—3; Cleghorn v. M'Loan, 6 —2, 6 —5; Smitli v. Dr. Isaacs. 6—l, 6—o; Wilson and Beere v. Eller and, Jeffrey, 3—6, 5 —6; Cleghorn and Smith v. I M'Lea'n ana Isaacs, 6~-1, 5—6, 6—3. j B Grade. j Brougham Hill I; defeated Brougham Hill II by 4 rubbers to, 2, 10 sets to 5, 78 games to 61. Roberts v. Townsend. 6—1,. 5—6, 3—6; Sampson v. Kean, 6—4, 6—4; Lawrence v. Hurley, 6 —2, 5—6, 6 —3; Marriner v. Barton, 6—5, 2—6, 6—3; Sampson and Marriner v. Kean and Barton, 6—2, 6—4; Roberts and Lawrence v. Towusend and Hurley, 6 —5, 6 —l. Victoria College II defeated Hutt by 5 rubbers to 1,-10 sets to 3, GS games to 43. De la Mare v. Brown, 6—3, 6—l: Duncan v. Kirk, 4—6, 2—6; Fair v. Clero, :6—3, 2—6, 6—l; Loughnan v. Gardiner, 6—l, 6—l; De la Mare and Duncan v. Brown and Kirk, 6 —l, 6—4; Fair, and Loughnan v. Clere and Gardiner, 6-r5, 6—5. Petone defeated Victoria College I by 5 rubbers to 1, 11 sets to 3, 76 games to 53. Parkinson v. Taylor, 6—5, 6—3; Duncan v. Rutherfurd, 6—l, 5—6, 6—l'.; Austin v. Parker, 6 —2, 2—6, 3—6; Andrews v. Mansfield, 6 —3, 6—5; Parkinson and Duncan v. Taylor and Rutherfurd, 6—4, 6—4; ' Austin and. Andrews v. Parker and Mansfield, 6-3, 6-3. , C Grade. Muritai defeated Kilbirnie by 6 rubbers to nil, 54 games to 25'. Howden v. Mitchell, 9—2; K. • M'Kenzio v. Stringer,. 9— Disher v, Palethorpe, 9-rr4; Walton v. Worboys, 9—4; Howden and M'Kenzie, v. Mitchell and Stringer, 9—4 ; Disher and Walton ,v. Palethorpe and Worboys, 9 —3.

Brougham Hill I defeated' Oriental by six rubbers to nil, 54 games to 18. Dawsou v. Hutton, : 9—3; Edwards v. Rojbmson, 9—7; Staples v. Ward, 9—2; Jack, v..Nome, 9 —l; Dawson and Jack v. Hutton and Eobinson, 9—4; Edwards and Staples v. Ward and Norrie, 9—l. ' Pet-one defeated Hutt by five rubbers to one, 52 games to 24.—Hope v. Nicholson, 9—2; Kean v. Heketa, 9—o; Duncan y; Ponanga, 7—9; Caverhillv. M'Kee, 9—7; Kean and Duncan v. Heketa and ll'Kee, 9—3; Hope and Oaverhill ■ v.> Nicholson and Ponanga, 9? —8...... ■ . Brougham Hill II defeated St. John's by three rubbers to three, 44 games to 31.—Manoy. v. C. Andrew, 6—9; Nagle v. Patterson, 3—9; Bicknell v. N. Andrew, 9—o; Rawnsley v. Boal, 9—3; Manoy and.llawnsley v. C. and N. 'Andrew, 9—l; Nagle and Bicknell v. Patterson and Boal, ,8 —9.

Trinity-, defeated Victoria- College by! thre« ■ rubbers -to three, 48 games .- to 41.—-Watt-s' v.. Scott, 7—9;'Jacobsen v. Randrup, 9—7';.Parker v. Arcus, 6—9: C.' Arcus v. Lea!ry, B—9 ; Watts, and Jacobsen v. Scott and Randrup, 9—o ; Parker and Arcus v. Arcus and Leary, 9—7. ; , ' -.i "D" Crado. ! ; Brougham Hill defeated . Victoria; College I by fivo rubbers to one, 48 games to 34.—Quimiellw. Rev. Comptony, 3—9; Oakley v. Inder, 9—4; Reeves -v. Dobbie, 9—4; Butcher v. Daniell;, 9—6: Quinnell and - Butcher v. Rev. Compton and Inder. 9—3; Oakley and Reeves v. Daniell a-nd Dobbie, 9—B. ■ Victoria College II defeated Oriental by three rubbers, to three,. 43 games to 41. —Toms v. Paterson, 2—9; Melody v. M'Cormick, 9—2; Eager v, Vaughan, 7—9; M'Kenr.ie v. Cottcll, 7 —9;. Toms and Melody : v. Paterson and M'Cormick, 9—6; Eager ' and M'Kenzie . v. Vaughan and Cottell, 9—6. Johnsonville v. Trinity Church.—Result not ascertainable. ' ■<;. LADIES' COMPETITION.—A : GRADE. Brdugham Hill defeated Wellington II by five rubbers to one, ,10 sets to 4, 73 games to 47. —Miss Morgan v. Miss At-mo're, 6—3,- 4—6, 6—4; Miss-Archer .v. Miss Francis, 6—o, 6—3; Mrs. W. E._ Howe v. Miss Webb,, 3—G, I—6; Miss:Davis v. Miss Kirkor, 6—l, 6—3; Misses Morgan and. Archer 1 v. Misses Atmore and Webb, 5—6, 6—l, 6—l; Mrs. Howe and 'Miss Davis v. Misses Francis and Kirker, 6—3,. 6—4. Thorndon v. Victoria College.—Result, not received, by match secretary. B Oracle. Petone defeated Victoria College by 3 rubbers to 3, ,36 games to' 34. Miss Bennett v. Miss Kerslake, 6—7; Miss D. Caverhill v. Miss V., Saxon, 3—7; Miss Walters.,v. Miss G. Saxon, 7—6; Miss 0. Caverhill v. Miss M'Kcllar, 2; Misses Bennett and D: Caverhill v. Misses Kerslake and V. Saxon, 7—5; Misses Walters and 0. Caverhill 'v. Misses G. Saxon and M'Kcllar, 6—7. Brougham Hill I defeated Brougham .Hill:II by default. C Oracle. . Trinity defeated ■ Brougham Hill by 4 rubbers to 2, 32' games' to 23. Miss D'Emden v. Miss ,Tingey,' 7—2; Mrs. Smart v. Miss. Alcorn, 7—o; Miss Gamble v. Miss Brown, 7—5; Miss Ho&derson v. Miss Bowley, o^-7; Miss D'Emden and Mrs. Smart v. ..Misses Tingey and Alcorn, 7—2;-Misses Gamble and Henderson Misses Brown and Bowley, : 4—7. . '

Johnsonville defeated Oriental by 3 •rubbers to 3, 30 games to 29. Mrs. Bowler v. Miss Miller, 3—7 ; Miss' Wilson v. Miss Buchan, 5—7; Miss Blair v. Miss Sheldon, 7—3; Miss Cook v. Miss Ward, 7 —3; Mrs. Bowler and Miss Wilson ,v. Misses Miller and Buchan; I—7;1 —7; Misses Blair and Cook v. Misses .Sheldon and Ward, 7—2. K'handallah defeated Kilbirnie by 5 rubbers to 1, 36 games to 21. Miss Clark v.. Miss Clirisp, I—7;1 —7; Miss N. Batham v. Miss Rutherford, 7—4; Miss D. iWillans v. Miss Worboys, 7—l; Miss Willans v. Miss Spraggon, 7—4; Misses Clark and Batham v. Misses Chrisp and Rutherford, 7—o; Misses Willans v. Misses Worboys and Spraggon, 7—5. Petone defeated Victoria College by 3 •rubbers to 3, 29 games to 27. Miss Udy v. Miss L. M'lntosh, 7—o; Miss Coch-rnnpi-v. Miss Atkinson, 2 —7; Miss Brooks v. Miss Cooke, 2—7; Miss Austin v. Miss Haldane, 7—5; Misses Ud.v and Cochrano v. Misses M'lntosh and Atkinson, 4—7; Misses Brooks and Austin v. Misses Cooko and Haldane, 7-1.