Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUPREAME COURT.

ALICE MARY ANSTICE ON TRIAL. JURY DISAGREE. A disagreement of tho jury occurred yesterday in tho case of Alice Mary Anstice, who was charged in the Supremo Court with having performed an illegal operation. Mr. W. H. D. Bell conducted tho prosecution, and Mr. T. M. Wilford appeared for the accused. When the jury returned to Court, at 6.35' o'clock, after four hours' deliberation, his Ilonnur the Chief JuKtice (Sir Rohert Stout), remarked that he hnd always regretted that the New Zealand law was unlike the Scotch law, in that it required a unanimous, and not merely a majority, verdict. A re-trial of the case was ordered for Wednesday next, and tho accused was admitted to 'bail;

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19100526.2.83.1

Bibliographic details

Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 826, 26 May 1910, Page 9

Word Count
119

SUPREAME COURT. Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 826, 26 May 1910, Page 9

SUPREAME COURT. Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 826, 26 May 1910, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert