Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

FREE TRADE AND THE FARMERS' UNION.

Sir,—Mr...W., J. Birch can see no-difference, between a tax on bread and a. tax on boots. Most people see a very ..But even, if this wete not . so, if ;the Farmers' Union is'sincere in desiring Free-trade, surely its first task ,should be to promote the abolition,of the, flour duty, and. then-it could, with the more cohfidencp, appeal to the country generally to 1 remove other, duties, which-may press upon farmers. At present- there is more .than a suspicion tliat-the Canterbury farmers, at any rate, aro opposed to the abolition of the duty on.flour.—l am, : etc.,. ' ! ; HAWKE'S BAY.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19091118.2.59.8

Bibliographic details

Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 667, 18 November 1909, Page 8

Word Count
103

FREE TRADE AND THE FARMERS' UNION. Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 667, 18 November 1909, Page 8

FREE TRADE AND THE FARMERS' UNION. Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 667, 18 November 1909, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert