Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

(Before Dr. A. H'Arthur, S.M.) .'■■; • "A PEST TO. SOCIETY." Thomas Teece, alias O'Connor, was charged with obtaining a pair of boots, valued at 14s. ■ '64.from Mann by false pretences. ' He pleadod not!guilty. , • ■ 'The . owner /of.' the boots • stated that about ' .September 27 accused and a woman called and 'purchased a pair of boots, and left an old pair, accused saying that he would call for them., ■ Arthur Mann, assistant to Albert: Mann; deposed that on October 5 accused returned and- , claimed another/.and a better pair, : which ho took away. . After further hearing his Worship imposed' a' sentenra of seven days' imprisonment for this .'offence.-.• • A second'charge, that - of being an idle'. and disorderly .person, and with consorting with re-' puted ■ thieves, was preferred. : Acting-Detective Cameron stated that he had. frequently seen' accused -j with. reputed thieves, ;of-whom he read an imposing : list. The magistrate" stated that accused was lapest'to sooiety;. and sentenced him to three months' imprisonment, with hard-labour. ' , . i- INSOBRIETY. v. One inebriate, a first offender, answered to his!name. I 'Ho was convicted and discharged. •' ' CIVIL BUSINESS.. Judgment by default was given in the following civil cases :WC6rtiraissioner' of Taxes v.Ar- • thur >Pavid Blicfc, 'ss.,"costs lis.'; same v. John'Guthrie, ; S11; costs'l7s.* and-'SI 7s. 6d., costs 7si Wellington ''Publishing Co. v. Harry Scoone's, -S3 : :17s; coste.-; 125.; ' Alexander ■ M'Meekan.. and Ifcnry : George Clarke,'assignee, .v., vßob'ert :Niphdls,' 'S3 Is.-.' : 9d.; costs lSs.it-'Magnus-Sanderson'and "Co., Ltd;, v. Dudley Byrne,; S8 l6s. 9d., costs Sl'Ss; Bd.j Frederifck i Cutlet Crease v.- Thomas' Henry : Robinson, pos3osiion bn November-2, -'and w63 155.; costs 123.; Maty Quinn v. Alfred. Webb,' Si la.'7d.', costs 10s.'i Joseph '.Onnrod' v. Richard Staddon, .•at-.95. :3d.V"cpsts7s«.;• ,G.'-H. Thornton- v. James Stewart,'"S3 Os". Bd.,co?tsl2j.; H. Oscar Hewitt and Co., Ltd;,- v. Southland Woolleli Maniifac-! Turing Co.; \£ll6s.'7d.,"costs 6s.'j same v.' John Fkhey./and .'Mrs.; Esther' Fakw; S3, 'costs 135.; '■Wlliam'Henty/SucWing' v.": Niels. P. "Nielson, SI 6s/ ; Bd.',:cOsts lis. j H; Oscar Hewitt and.Co., ltd.;' v." Ti»irilona Pntua and .Mrs. Hapimana pntua,' Sll v 3os.; i.costs"' 'S2 l?s. ; "New' Zealand < ■Times" Co.; .Ltd., ' v?'Geio'rge l 'frasli:,- S8 3sV 2d:, costs SISS. 6d.; T. and' W. -Young v. W. Baum•ber, S3 is; (id., costs 105..; James Smith,'Xtd., v. Thomas Ponton,'Sl 10s.-6d„- costs 55.; Wm. Macßeth- v. 'Victor Maurice Brannd,.':S9 175., costs Si 3s. Gdr .. : . - JUDGMENT SUMMONSES. , In the judgment summons case, Kirkcaldio and Stains; Ltd.,' v. George' Coopor, defendant

• was ordered to pay.'a debt of .v 619 Is. Bd., ori or before November i, in,default fourteen days' r. imprisonment. ■". .'.-'■■"■■'' ... ; Victor M. Braund was ordered to pay the Wellington Publishing Co., Ltd.," a debt of J63 15s. on or before November 2, in default three days', imprisonment. ... No orders.wero made in.tho follo'wing'cases: —Elizabeth Littlejohn v. John Bailey, a debt of ill ,11s. 6d.; C. and A. Odlin Timber and ; Hardware Co;, Ltd.,, v. William John Holmes, a debt of US 35.'9 d.; Oscar George French v. -, • Donald Graham, a debt of JE2S 19s. 6d. , j '•;.". MTJCH ADO ABODT NOTHING." ■ /Dr. M'Arthnr, S.M., gave judgment in a case s between Elizabeth Eidgeway (Mr. Fair) and • Thomas, M'Carthy (Mr. Hislop), a claim for • JE3i: IBs.'_lod. and-a couuter-claim for X 67 19s. i 10d., which arose out of an exchange of proi perines between tho parties. ; The claim hinged over a variety of fittings; which were to have ■ been left on one or the other property. Tho i evidence as to the nature .and number of these fittings, and as to their removal, was meagre, >. and there was little, if any, evidence of their ' having been permanently affixed to tho free- ' bold- ... Dealing with,the counter-claim his Worship 1 said:'"There is no evidence to ■• show why | the pig died so suddenly or the cow. shied |so wickedly-on the change of ownership'. The : case appears to me an apt illustration of' much '. ado about.'nothing.'" 1 i ■ Judgment', was given, for plaintiff for M ',' on. the claim "with costs -i! 3 lis.,: and costs'on . the. counter-claim £2 2s. INCOME TAX. The Commissioner of Taxes (Mr. Myers) proceeded against James Gower Chambers, as agentfor non-resident traders, to recover .£2O 12s. 6d. income tax on £$15, atjls:inthei; £18 155., with 10 per cent., ..£l''. 17s. 6d. :'. ■;' Defendant stated that'he/was a-.manufac- ■ turer's agent' and represented' a number of 1 British companies, lie held, feat'he was not, morally;or legally/liable for the amount as h-3 received his salary from these firms, and' he termed' tho claim a frivolous one.' He had . not sold the goods on which the tax was levied.. - . > , The magistrate said that defendant was liable for the-tax' and entered-'up judgment for plaintiff with costs £i 4s. i; '•' "!{ 'CLAIM'for : avages... John jFrancis Colenso (Mr. Kirkcaldie) prp- , ceeded against Charles Thorp-(Mr. Jackson) to recover'VJE4o for wages alleged to.be due. ; . ' .'■ Plaintiff stated : that after negotiations. between'the parties, a fish saloon Was purchased by-defendant, who engaged plaintiff as cook. ' Witness'took no share in the purchaseand ; there was no'partnership. He was to receive £10 per,'month, but he received no payment, the excuse'being,that,business was too slack. , The wages,, however, were .always promised ■ him.' ;-. :"''■'■■'. "'-...' .--.'.« :; '■■•. ..■ : :■., To Mr. Jackson: There was'no' suggestionthat the..two were to buy a saloon. 'The name on the .window, was C. and J.; Thorp. ' Mr. Jiickson'. Did not,defendant suggest that as you were not well known it would be betten to trade as brothers?''.v:'. ;':' : '"' ■■'<- Witness: No. For the defence it'was contended that there was'a'partnership'and that, as the result of a; quarrel, plaintiff demanded wages. '.-.'■ '■ ■ Further, hearing was adjourned, until today.- z : : ' ■ :.'-.' .-••• '■■■" ;' ■•''.. .: .-

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19091020.2.10.3

Bibliographic details

Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 642, 20 October 1909, Page 5

Word Count
903

MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 642, 20 October 1909, Page 5

MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 642, 20 October 1909, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert