LAWN TENNIS.

Dominion, Volume 2, Issue 450, 8 March 1909, Page 3

LAWN TENNIS.

SATURDAY'S MATCHES. The following are the results of the lairn tenuis matches played on Saturday:— Cup. Wellington defeated Brougham Hill A by 11 sets to 2 (100 games to 3S). I'ernie won by default; M'Nicol v. J. A. B. Howe, 9-6; Ward v. _ Lawrence, 9 —3; Sheppard v. O'Leary, 9—2; Miss Dimant v. Miss Morgan, 4—7; Miss Howard v. Miss Farmer, 7—3; M'Js'icol r. Ward, won by, default; Shand and Sheppard v. Herd and O'Lcary, 3—l; I'ernie and JSller v. Lawrence and Uren, 9—l; Misses Dimant and Howard v. Misses Morgan and Fanner, 5—7; Misses Hannah.and Francis v. Mrs. Burton and Mrs. Rothschild, 7—5; Shand and Miss Hannah v. Herd and Mrs. Burton, 7—3; Eller and Miss Francis v. Uren and Miss Rothschild, 7—l. Newtown defeated Petone by 10 sets to 3 (92 games to 65). Redward v. Hawk! ». o—9; Naglo v ureen, 9—7); Jones v. Corneil, 9—7; Morris °r l ' rs ' Nagle v. Miss Horne, 7—o; Mrs. Grady v. Mrs. Hawkins, 7—5; Redward and Nagle v. Hawkins and Green, &—9; Jones and Lewis t. Cornell and Parkinson, 6—9; Morns and Powell v. Kirk .and Duncan, 9—4; Mrs. Nagle and Miss Robinson v. Miss Horne and Mrs. Hawkins, 7—5; Mrs. Grady and Miss Clark v. Misses Bennett and Curtis, 7—3; Lewis and Miss Eobinson v. Parkinson and Miss Bennett, 7—2; Powell and Miss Clark v. Duncan and Curtis, 7—l. , Hutt defeated Brougham Hill B bv 13 sets ~n}'® games to 62). Jackson v Williams, 9—7; Clero v. Marriner, 9—2; Callender v. Hurley, 9—B; Brown v. Dart, 9—4; Miss Ross v. Miss Davis, 7—3; Mrs. Wagg v. Miss Crombie,' 7—2; Jackson and Clere v. Williams and Dart, 9—B; Callender and Treadwell v. Hurley and- Marriner, 9—B; Brown and Kirk v. Arden and Foreman, 9—5; Hiss Ross and Mrs. Wagg v. Misses Davis and Crombie, 7—3; Mrs. Murphv and Miss Callender v. Misses Hayes and Sullivan, 7—3; Treadwell and Mrs. Murphv v. Foreman and Miss Hayes, 7—5; Kirk and Miss Callender v. Arden and Miss Sullivan, 7—4. . Victoria College defeated Karori by 10 sets to 3 (96 games to 66). D. Smith v. Putnam, 6—9; Eichelbaum v. Kelso, 5—9; Cleghorn v. Douglas, 9—4; Scott v. Henderson, 9—6; Miss Reeve v. Miss Smythe, 7—l; Miss Saxon v. Miss Bennett, 7—4; Eichelbaum and Smith v. Putnam and Douglas, 3—9; Cleghorn and Scott v. Kelso and A. G. Henderson, 10—8; Taylor and Beere v. D. S. Henderson and Robertson, 9—4; Misses Reevo and Saxon v. Misses Smythe and Bennett, 7—2; Misses L. M'lntosh and At- | kinson v. Misses M'Kenzie and I. Bennett, 7—2; D. M. Beere and Miss Atkinson v. D. S. Henderson and Miss M'Kenzie, 10—S; Taylor and Miss M'lntosh v. Robertson and I. Bennett, 7-0. Pennant. .. Muritai defeated Brougham Hill by 4 sets to 3 (47 games to 46). Howden v. Barton, 9—4; Wright v. Kean, 9—5; Shcrris v. Harton, 3.9; Miss P. Low v Miss Hogg, 7—6; Wright and Howden v. Barton and Kean, 7—9; Misses Low v. Misses Hogg *nd Carter, 7—G; Harton and Miss W. Low v. Sherris and Miss Carter, 5—7. Newtown defeated Victoria College B by 4 sets to 3 (47 games to 43). Grady v. Fair, 6-9; Hursthouse v. Hitchings, 4—9; Pratt v. Tegner, 9—3; Miss Veitch v. Miss Barkas, 7—5; Grady and Hursthouse v. Fair and Hitchings, 7—9; Misses Veitch and Christie v. Misses Barkas and Gibbs, 7—3; Pratt and Miss Christie v. Tegner and Miss Gibbs, 7—5. Racquet. Brougham Hill defeated Bidwill Street A bv 4 sets to 3 (47 games to 45). O'Connor v. Hamilton, B—9; Northcote v. Pavitt, 9—7; Hutchison v. Swinburne, 9—B; Miss Creasey v. Miss Cunningham, 3—7; O'Connor and Northcote v. Hamilton and Pavitt, 9—5; Misses Creasey and Mitchinson v. Miss Cunningham and Mrs. Chapman, o—7; Hutchison and Miss Mitchinson v. Swinburne and Mrs. Chapman, ■7-4.' : Kilbimie A defeated Trinity A by 6 sots to 1 (53 games to 43). Mitchell v. Dixon, 9—7; de Rose v. Crewes, 5—9; Druitimond v. Stringer, 9—4; Miss Asquith v. Miss Hayes, 7—5; Mitchell and de Rose r. Crewes and Stringer, 9—G; Misses Asquith and Crisp- v. Misses Hayes and Betty, 7—6; Drummond arid Miss Crisp v. Dixon and Miss Betty, 7—6. Kilbirnie B defeated Victoria College A by 5 sets to 2 (53 games to 41). Purchas v. C. G. Wright, 9—6; N. Mitcholl v. Paterson, B—9; L. Mitchell v. Smith, 9—B; Miss D'Emden v. Miss Thompson, 4—7; Purchas and Mitchell v. Wright and Paterson, 9—4; Misses D'Emden and Carson v. Misses Thompson and Taylor, 7—5; L. Mitchell and Miss Carson v. Smith and Miss Taylor, 7—2.