BREACH OF AWARD.
WHY WAS NOT THE WORKER CITED? (by telegraph.—special correspondent.) Auckland, April 29. The Ferro-Concrete Company was citcd before the Arbitration Court yesterday on three charges of employing. carpenters before 8 a.m. without payment of overtime. Mr. K. I* I .' Moore, the Chief Engineer, in appearing oil the Company's' behalf, inquired why the men who were parties to the alleged broach were not cited also. His Honour observed that the Inspector could cite the men if ho liked; it was usual to do so." "Have you cited the workers?" asked His Honour, turning to Mr. Gresham, Inspector of Awards. "No," replied Mr. Gresham. "Why not? It is the custom to cite the worker as well when ho is a party to a breach of an award." The Inspector, howovor, offered no explanation.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19080430.2.23
Bibliographic details
Dominion, Volume 1, Issue 185, 30 April 1908, Page 5
Word Count
134BREACH OF AWARD. Dominion, Volume 1, Issue 185, 30 April 1908, Page 5
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in