Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Resident Magistrate's Court.

BALCLUTHA. "Wednesday, Sept. 4, 1878. (Before E. H. Carew, Esq., R.M.) Police v. LLOTD.-Wm. Lloyd was charged for that he, being tbe holder "of a publican's license, did unlawfully permit a certain game of chance, commonly known as " yankee grab," to be played in his licensed house on August 2, 1878. Inspector Thomson conducted the prosecution, and Mr Denniston appeared for defendant, who pleaded not guilty. From the evidence it appeared that the annual meeting of the Clutha Horticultural Society was held in Mr Lloyd's hotel on the evening referred to. About ten o'cleck, after the business bad been gone through, it was proposed to have " a shilling in," so as in some measure to recompense the landlord for the use of the room. This was agreed to, and the winner paid the proceeds for refreshments. It also appeared that Mr Lloyd was unaware of the mode adopted to procure the required funds. The case was dismissed.

Ayson a;nd Wilson v. Parry.— Claim, L 2 12s od. Mr Henderson for plaintiffs. Judgment by confession for amount claimed, and costs, 6s.

Jones v. G-ascoione.- Claim, LlO. Mr Taylor for defendant. Plaintiff did not appear.

Almond v. Haworth.— Claim, L3O, sheep trespass. Mr Henderson for plaiutiff, and Mr Taylor for defendant, who pleaded not guilty.

Haworth v. ALMOND.- Claim, L3O, horse trespass. Mr Taylor for plaintiff, and Mr Henderson for defendant. After hearing the evidence in both cases, judgment was given for Ll damages in each case, with costs of Court and professional fee.

Gedge v. Newson.-— Claim, L 36 3s 6d, for wages. Mr Reid for plaintiff, and Mr Taylor for defendant. This case waa not concluded when the Court rose.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CL18780906.2.13

Bibliographic details

Clutha Leader, Volume IV, Issue 217, 6 September 1878, Page 5

Word Count
283

Resident Magistrate's Court. Clutha Leader, Volume IV, Issue 217, 6 September 1878, Page 5

Resident Magistrate's Court. Clutha Leader, Volume IV, Issue 217, 6 September 1878, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert