Fishing industry attacks study
By
RICHARD CRESSWELL
Proposals in a Govern-ment-commissioned study on the fishing industry, suggesting a large increase in resource rentals, have been attacked by the fishing industry. The report, by Peat Marwick, proposes the industry pay $lOO million a year in rentals. The acting group director of MAFFish, Dr Robin Allen, said MAFFish would check the validity of the report’s findings, “but it has no reason to question them.” In a statement yesterday, the vice-president of the Fishing Industry Association, Mr Peter Talley, said the proposals were preposterous. The report was riddled with technical inaccuracies, he said. Total fish sales had been overstated.
Mr Talley said Government officials had appeared obsessed about orange roughy, which represented only 20 per
cent of the industry’s total revenue.
The report also concluded assets in use by the industry had increased in value. “Those who wrote the report were obviously unaware of the corrosive effects of salt water on fishing vessels," he said.
The board’s chief executive, Mr Ray Dobson, suggested it might be unconstitutional to increase the rental, which was a form of tax.
The industry had not been approached about the report, he said. Rentals, the fee paid for holding quotas and to cover the cost of the Government’s organisation of the industry, totalled $25 million a year. The report proposed an additional rental of $75 million from a total turnover of $B5O million, said Mr Dobson.
“The industry is just beginning to return to a normal level of return, and now this descends on us/’ he said.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19890727.2.59
Bibliographic details
Press, 27 July 1989, Page 7
Word Count
259Fishing industry attacks study Press, 27 July 1989, Page 7
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Copyright in all Footrot Flats cartoons is owned by Diogenes Designs Ltd. The National Library has been granted permission to digitise these cartoons and make them available online as part of this digitised version of the Press. You can search, browse, and print Footrot Flats cartoons for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from Diogenes Designs Ltd for any other use.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.