Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Radio alleges censorship

PA Auckland Tougher penalties proposed for infringements by the radio industry have been described as censorship.

Provisions in the Broadcasting Bill allow the Broadcasting Standards Authority to put a station off the air for 24 hours or to impose a fine of up to $lOO,OOO for breaches of a code of good behaviour. The Bill, according to Radio New Zealand and the Independent Broadcasters’ Association, seeks to over-regulate and penalise their industry. “The penalties are extraordinary and amount to censorship,” they told the parliamentary planning and development select committee in Auckland yesterday. A fine of $lOO,OOO represented the loss of more than a year’s profit for most commercial radio stations, the broadcasters said.

Putting a radio station

off the air for a day would cost an average of $6OOO in income, or, for a television station, between $200,000 and $300,000, they said. “It is conceivable that the penalty could be greater than a District Court could impose.” The penalty for not complying with an order by the authority was “extraordinarily severe.”

The broadcasters added: “It is difficult to think of any equivalent size of Industry penalty.” They suggested a $5OOO maximum.

The broadcasters said there would be an effect on the public if a station was forced off the air.

“For the elderly, in particular, broadcasting services are expected as much as water and power. To withdraw programmes would be a disservice to the public. To dislodge carefully planned advertising campaigns would result in severe revenue losses by business firms.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19890401.2.70

Bibliographic details

Press, 1 April 1989, Page 9

Word Count
253

Radio alleges censorship Press, 1 April 1989, Page 9

Radio alleges censorship Press, 1 April 1989, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert