Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Scandal prompts reform proposals

By

HELENA WISNIEWSKI

NZPA London The release of a report on a child sex abuse crisis in northern England has led to Government proposals for reforming the handling of abuse cases. A detailed official report on the “Cleveland controversy” was published recently and was followed by an announcement from the House of Commons. The Minister of Health, Tony Newton, called for an Office of Child Protection to be established, with powers to investigate local authority applications in care proceedings. He proposed grants for training health workers be increased £7 million ($17.71 million), and for detailed guidance circulars to be published for all social workers, doctors and the police. The controversy that prompted the reforms began last year in the northeast city of Middlesbrough, when 121 children were diagnosed as sex abuse victims in five months.

The children were taken into care and separated from their families, usually on the basis of medical evidence supplied by two doctors at the heart of the inquiry. Both Dr Marietaa Higgs and her colleague, Dr Geoffrey White, used the technique of anal dilation

(R.A.D.) as virtual proof of the existence of anal abuse, the inquiry discovered.

The controversy was only brought to light when Cleveland social welfare authorities found they could not cope with the huge influx of “abused” children.

A 74-day official inquiry followed and in January work began on a report into the affair. In the 320page report, it was concluded that “terrible damage” had been done to some families whose children were wrongly taken away.

The two doctors had detected some genuine cases of anal abuse, it said, but some children had suffered unnecessary harm.

“There is plenty of evidence that Dr Higgs is a caring, competent, hardworking doctor with a particular expertise in the care of children. “(But) she was unwise to come to a firm conclusion rather than a strong suspicion on physical signs alone.”

Under the new changes proposed by the Minister of Health, parents will be able to appeal against protection orders in the future.

Full-scale new legislation will follow later this year to cut the length of separation between parents and their children when suspected victims are put in care.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19880712.2.151.11

Bibliographic details

Press, 12 July 1988, Page 35

Word Count
368

Scandal prompts reform proposals Press, 12 July 1988, Page 35

Scandal prompts reform proposals Press, 12 July 1988, Page 35

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert