Commission says ad bans anti-competitive
PA Wellington Advertising bans on members of trade associations are likely to infringe the Commerce Act, because they are anti-com-petitive, the chairman of the Commerce Commission says.
The professions in particular were inclined to make rules restricting their members advertising, Mr John Collinge said in a speech to the Council of the Institution of Professional Engineers of New Zealand. By their very nature such rules were likely to be anticompetitive, he said. Advertising was not
necessarily incompatible with professional status and advertising restrictions could stop the public from easily finding out about the range of services available. Studies in America comparing states which allowed advertising and those which did not had shown no support for the view that the quality of services was adversely affected by advertising, Mr Collinge said. However, not all advertising restrictions would be anti-competitive or of no benefit to the public. Rules about comparative advertising, that is,
claims of superiority which were difficult to prove, were not out of place for the professions. Mr Collinge said he also favoured rules which prevented inaccurate or misleading advertising, although thay were likely to be penalised under the Fair Trading Bill, expected to come into force in 1987.
Advertising restrictions designed to stop the . profession being given a bad image would be acceptable under the Commerce Act if they were administered properly. Mr Collinge said there were grey areas, in par-
ticular the danger in associations monitoring the advertising of its members purely on the grounds of taste. The public were likely to be able to judge matters of taste for themselves, and judgements by an association could be an indirect way of preventing what it considered to be over-vigorous competition. Mr Collinge said that there had been a number of inquiries made to the Commission about the right to restrict competition by limiting advertising and any complaints in this respect would be investigated closely.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19861014.2.137.11
Bibliographic details
Press, 14 October 1986, Page 32
Word Count
321Commission says ad bans anti-competitive Press, 14 October 1986, Page 32
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Copyright in all Footrot Flats cartoons is owned by Diogenes Designs Ltd. The National Library has been granted permission to digitise these cartoons and make them available online as part of this digitised version of the Press. You can search, browse, and print Footrot Flats cartoons for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from Diogenes Designs Ltd for any other use.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.