Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Housing, employment linked—economist

PA Wellington Rental housing is crucial to keeping unemployment down while the economy is being restructured, according to the ANZ Bank’s London-based chief economist, Mr David Ashby. Mr Ashby, in New Zealand recently, said the lack of rental accommodation and the unwillingness of people to move to other regions for jobs had left areas of Britain with high unemployment. Areas in the north-east of Britain had unemployment rates of round 25 per cent, while southern regions had labour shortages. Part of the reason for this disparity was the

unwillingness of people to shift away from their families and the lack of rental accommodation. About 60 per cent of Britons owned their own home, compared with about 30 per cent after World War 11, he said. However, the same problem had not arisen in the United States, where people had always been more prepared to move to other regions for jobs, and where a smaller proportion of people owned their own homes. Mr Ashby also believed that privatisation of State enterprises would prove beneficial to New Zealand. Referring to experience in Britain, he said the sale of State enterprises had realised three benefits: © It had raised revenue the Government would otherwise have had to raise through the Govern-

ment bond market. © It had reduced the influence of the State sector in the economy; a philosophical gain for Mrs Thatcher’s Government. ® And it had made the enterprise more efficient. Mr Ashby noted New Zealand was going through the same process and said that, although there was an element of fear, particularly among workers who saw they no longer had a guarantee of job security till retirement, there were benefits in privatisation. The enterprise had to look more closely at its activities and ask whether they were profitable. At the same time, workers had gained a greater sense of responsibility through the personal shareholdings they had been able to take up In the enterprises.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19860723.2.54

Bibliographic details

Press, 23 July 1986, Page 9

Word Count
324

Housing, employment linked—economist Press, 23 July 1986, Page 9

Housing, employment linked—economist Press, 23 July 1986, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert