Training in speech

Press, 9 December 1982, Page 20

Training in speech

Sir,—Terence Cutler (December 4) rightly complains about the poor quality of our speech. Too many people do not know how to project their voices or that shouting is unnecessary and only a noise bombardment. Poor speech means poor communication, resulting in needless tension and frustration.. Much written English is no' better. The French have just made basic French compulsory in every course, with the full course optional. Such a- move here would end complaints. about the School Certificate English paper arid be a better founda'tion for trading in those markets we so badly need. Those who write concise, easily understood in their own

language do best in putting their ideas across in another one. Examiners would then couch questions so less reading time is needed. Optional English could be of a higher standard and produce exciting creative work, a real New Zealand literature. Neither the average nor the gifted can develop talents to the full at present.—Yours, etc., A. M. COATES. December 7, 1982. Sir, — Learning the Maori language and its correct pronunciation is being given its rightful place as part of our New Zealand heritage; but should we not ensure that clear, pleasant, expressive English, free from affectation or slovenly enunciation is also preserved? The standards set by our teachers and broadcasters are vital. Once all of our radio announcers were models of correct pleasant speech and speech training was an integral part of the school curriculum. I remember being profoundly shocked when I first heard my voice on a tape recording. We Kiwis should recognise that “duty” begins with “d“ and Tuesday with “t.” Our slovenly "Is” are causing such pronunciations as Wallington, alectricity, devalop, colcha, sports resolts, light bolbs, etc. Our bad “i” sounds are producing such pronunciations as “Thers wernd werll move swerftly across Nalson” and we sometimes have sessions on “halping chooldren with their edgercation.” Language is never static but worth while standards of correct pleasant speech are always desirable. — Yours, etc., E. MULCOCK. December 8, 1982.