Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Farmers advised not to shear

Farmers have been advised against shearing lambs to make money out of the supplememtary minimum price scheme for wool. A Ministry of Agriculture advisory officer at Ashburton, Mr K. E. MuscroftTaylor, and the Canterbury Frozen Meat Company’s area supervisor. Mr D. Gawn, said that it appeared farmers were prepared to shear prime lambs, send them to the works after the required three weeks, and thereby obtain the S.M.P. payment for their wool. There was little money in doing this, although there could be other management reasons. ■ The present lambs’ wool price was about $2.45 a kilogram. The supplement would be a percentage of that figure based on the difference between the adjusted weighted average sale price for the most recent auction sale and the S.M.P. of 320 c a kilogram expressed as a percentage of the adjusted weighted average sale price. As an example, they quoted Ikg of greasy wool valued at $2.45. With the S.M.P., it would gross $3.06. With a 200 g pelt worth 18c, the total return would be $3.24. They set the cost of shearing, packs, Wool Board levy, and freight at $1 to reduce the net return to $2.24. An average white-face woolly lamb with a pelt with

a I.2kg wool-pull was w’orth $2.55 at present. This meant that there was a loss with shearing of 31c a lamb. In 1979, said Mr MuscroftTaylor and Mr Gawn, the farmer got $ll.lB for meat and $4.85 for the pelt. A year later, the meat was worth $14.69 and the pelt $1.44. This year, the meat had increased to $18.98 and the pelt to $2.55. All the examples involved a 13kg PM lamb with a I.2kg woolly pelt. Management considerations justifying shearing white-faced lambs were that smaller lambs usually grew better when shorn. Shorn lambs were less prone to flystrike, but more prone to pleurisy if bad weather followed shearing or if heavyweight lambs were being raised. “Shearing increased the feed demand as well as delaying drafting by at least three weeks. But on an irrigated or cropping farm where feed surpluses occur in the late summer or early autumn, shearing is probably justified,” said Messrs Gawn ■and Muscroft-Taylor. “As a general principle, do not shear lambs for the sole purposes of making money from the S.M.P. for wool. But shearing the bottom half of wether lambs for later sale is probably justified on farms with adequate summer feed.” they said.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19811219.2.119

Bibliographic details

Press, 19 December 1981, Page 25

Word Count
409

Farmers advised not to shear Press, 19 December 1981, Page 25

Farmers advised not to shear Press, 19 December 1981, Page 25

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert