Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Conservation

Sir, — I assess the letter of Stan Hemsley (July’ 4) which concludes with New Zealand’s desperate need for a Bill of Rights and a Freedom of Information Act to be one of the most consequential ever to be printed in your columns. But how

does one overcome the apathy of voters and the arrogance of the present dictatorial administration to bring these fundamental democratic principles into being? I am sincerely motivated in seeing the process of these very essential principles into law irrespective of which party is in power. However, only a few people seem to appreciate the gravity of their exclusion. I respectfully suggest that a pro-con article re the above would be most helpful. — Yours, etc. ARTHUR MAY. July 3, 1980. [lt is to be hoped that the interested parties made their submissions first to the Committee on Official Information. — Editor]

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19800711.2.92.3

Bibliographic details

Press, 11 July 1980, Page 12

Word Count
144

Conservation Press, 11 July 1980, Page 12

Conservation Press, 11 July 1980, Page 12

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert