Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Carless days

Sir, — Mark Taylor (November 19) is right in his criticism of earless days.

The comedy scene of the year must surely be members of the several cars fraternity driving off to their chosen pastime any day of the week, while the one-car man is cycling, bussing or walking to his job and contributing towards their superannuation. A more serious aspect is that a great number of the cars owned by the affluent have been acquired and used as a tax-deductible item. Most ordinary people do not benefit from this type of _ perk. Because of the real inconvenience of the earless day, many have bought cycles for $2OO, or motor-cycles for considerably more plus expenses. Are these “not budgeted for” items going to be considered for tax deduction? — Yours, etc., J. DYER. November 26, 1979.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19791128.2.113.1

Bibliographic details

Press, 28 November 1979, Page 20

Word Count
136

Carless days Press, 28 November 1979, Page 20

Carless days Press, 28 November 1979, Page 20

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert