Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Benefit payment

Sir, — On what grounds does the Government contemplate reducing the supplementary benefit by $8 a week? The maximum benefit for a solo mother with two children is $97 a week if the cost of her rent or housing

repayment qualifies her to receive the $l6 a week supplementary benefit. Since January milk has increased 50 per cent, power charges are up 45 per cent and other prices have risen. An average family has had its regular living costs increased by $8 to $lO a week over the last six months. Why is it, m these times of economic struggle, that the Government chooses to deprive the children of a solo parent who has no say in her income? .1 feel a mother’s place is with her children, but this maj' no longer be possible if the supplementary benefit is altered. — Yours, etc., RACHEL RYAN. July 13, 1979.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19790717.2.128.10

Bibliographic details

Press, 17 July 1979, Page 18

Word Count
149

Benefit payment Press, 17 July 1979, Page 18

Benefit payment Press, 17 July 1979, Page 18

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert