Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

One crane enough now

Lyttelton’s failure to persuade the Minister of Transport, Mr McLachlan, that the port should have a second container crane should not be regarded as a disaster. He has unheld the Ports Authority decision that one crane at Lyttelton is sufficient in the meantime. To upset this decision the Minister would have had to find reasons that served “national interest" He could not entertain a case that rested solely on local benefits, unless these coincided with what was best for the national port system. In fact the Minister has probably done Lyttelton and its customers a favour in rejecting the Harbour Board's appeal Io him.

Many arguments can be produced in favour of having a second crane: it would certainly speed the handling of ships: it would sustain the movement of container cargo in the event of the breakdown of the other crane; it might be helpful in promoting the port among potential users of Lyttelton; greater use of this port might relieve the railways and road system of some burden. If the container traffic through Lyttelton

were greater than it now is, or if it could be shown to be in line for substantial growth, the cost of an extra crane would be of less importance. Given the present level of trade, Lyttelton can well do without the higher charges that an extra crane would entail.

The board has plans for the substantial renovation of the port in other ways, and if these plans go ahead it will be well placed to accommodate other forms of shipping and handling equipment. If the board prepares its case well, it should have little trouble in obtaining the approval of the Ports Authority Development of the Canterbury region and of the whole South Island is a matter of “national interest,” and the provision of appropriate port facilities must be part of this development. In due course a second container crane may be essential, but trends in cargo handling do not make the need certain. The Minister’s decision is really a blessing, and in spite of the set-back that some will find in it, this blessing is not even disguised.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19781104.2.74

Bibliographic details

Press, 4 November 1978, Page 14

Word Count
360

One crane enough now Press, 4 November 1978, Page 14

One crane enough now Press, 4 November 1978, Page 14

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert