Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

M.P. angry about roll

PA Wanganui The Social Credit leader,Mr B. C. Beetham, has con-1 1 idemned the large number of : special votes disallowed in ! the Rangitikei by-election as 1 a “sad commentary” on the 1 ■ system of maintaining electoral rolls. He was commenting on! the official declaration of* the by-election result —! showing that he has a! majority of 1335. About 840 of the 1787! special votes cast were dis-; allowed. Of these, 751 spe-i cial votes were disallowed'! because people were not on: the electoral roll. Of the 946 special votes i 1 allowed. Mr Beetham won I 426. Mr J. Bull (National)! 408, Mr J. J. Stewart! (Labour) 97, Dr J. D. Hock-! ing (Values) 14, and Mr M.l (

J. Leniston (Independent) 1. I Mr Beetham’s vote wentl I up 929 to 6804, compared; 'with the 1975 General Elec-j :tion. National dropped 2162: ; to 5469, and Labour 649 to | 1614. Altogether, 14,164 valid i I votes were cast, compared' with 16,141 in 1975. Mr Beetham said there! were 360 names entered! twice on the roll, and six! three times. It was an “un-i fortunate and sad corn-!! mentary” on the system off maintaining electoral rolls if

that so many special votes were disallowed, and that ■ the Rangitikei roll was “a | mess.” The high number of votes disallowed also reflected the speed with which the byelection had been called, the subsequent early roll closing, and confusion among imany people about whether I they were eligible to vote. Mr Beetham said the conI firmed big swing away from ! National, meant that it had j ‘better start looking for reasons other than simply the: iprotest vote to explain away! f the situation.” He said he expected to: i win in November with a reiduced majority, but the I usual continuing deteriora-. ition in the economy and: [farm incomes would prevent] I the main parties “squeezingl (out” Socred.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19780304.2.15

Bibliographic details

Press, 4 March 1978, Page 2

Word Count
316

M.P. angry about roll Press, 4 March 1978, Page 2

M.P. angry about roll Press, 4 March 1978, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert