Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Grant priorities may be altered

The Christchurch City Council’s method of allocating grant money might be changed this year. Block funding might be set aside when the annual budget is approved in May, and organisations would apply for specific grants later in the year.

mended by the policy and finance committee. Block votes might be made for cultural, recreational and welfare activities.

In recent years, grants have taken up much of the debate time at annual estimates meetings. Sir Robert Macfarlane said it had become “a horse-trading procedure,” and that every councillor was subject to pressures from groups to have their recommended grants increased.

He predicted that the annual “wants list” from city groups would rise 50 per cent this year because of hard economic times. The committee’s chairman

(Cr N. G. Hattaway) agreed that “large items of expenditure have virtually been ignored” while grants were debated. He said the new system should change that.

Some councillors suggested that this year could be one for hard decisions on traditional grants. The Town Clerk (Mr J. H. Gray) agreed that 1978 welfare needs "may be higher than other highly desirable areas, but maybe they are not so essential in people terms.”

The tendency had been for traditional recipients of large grants to get similar amounts year after year. “With all the best will in the world, there is not much left over for other groups,” he said. Different priorities could emerge this year. “It could be quite a lengthy exercise,” Mr Gray added. “Perhaps we should go back to square one, and give all organisations an equal chance.”

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19780216.2.77

Bibliographic details

Press, 16 February 1978, Page 7

Word Count
267

Grant priorities may be altered Press, 16 February 1978, Page 7

Grant priorities may be altered Press, 16 February 1978, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert