Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Viewers’ Views

“POINT COUNTER POINT” Pandora’s criticism of “Point Counter Point” missed most of the point. The 8.8. C. dramatisation of it emphasised the plot dealing with the assassination of the Fascist leader which was a very timely subject when the book was published in 1928. However, Aldous Huxley was obsessed with the question of whether or not bad means could ever have beneficial results, and such questions as: “Should one assassinate Fascist or Nazi leaders?” obviously left him undecided. For this reason he made the assassin, Spandrel], anything but a hero. For this reason he imagined the Fascist movement growing even more rapidly after the murder of its leader. Still, it is odd that a critic should find such themes so uninteresting. Pandora reminds us that we really do live miles from the world’s culture centres.— MARK D. SADLER. [lf the correspondent had read all “The Press” reviews of this programme, or had remembered what was in them, he might have made a more temperate objection to the final review. “Point Counter Point” was commended warmly and regularly for its content, presentation and acting. Even the final review said there was no lack of quality in the material or the production, but merely sug-i gested it was a relief it was over, because the excesses of! cyncism and evil had begun : to pall, through their quan-i tity.—PANDORA]

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19720703.2.37

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume CXII, Issue 32958, 3 July 1972, Page 4

Word Count
228

Viewers’ Views Press, Volume CXII, Issue 32958, 3 July 1972, Page 4

Viewers’ Views Press, Volume CXII, Issue 32958, 3 July 1972, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert