LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Press, Volume CXII, Issue 32848, 23 February 1972, Page 16

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

(1) Letters to be considered for this column must not exceed 150 words. They should be on only one side of the paper; preferably typewritten, otherwise clearly written in ink; and ample margins and space between lines should be left for convenience in sub-editing. (2) A legible signature and full address—not a P.O. box number — are required whether these are to be printed or not. (3) The correspondent must say whether the letter has been or is to be submitted elsewhere. (4) The editor cannot return or keep any letter not accepted for printing; nor does he undertake to acknowledge or enter into correspondence concerning tetters, although an acknowledgement will be made where this seems to be necessary or helpful. (5) As a general rule, correspondence on news items in other publications, or carried on radio and television, is not acceptable. R. J. Glen.—No space now to discuss Social Credit. B. Burke. —See replies to other correspondents. Hard-hit Customer. —Actionable. We cannot pursue the matter further in this column. J. D. McUraith. —Reduce it to 150 words and we’ll seek com-

ment. Another Punter.—Letter and reply printed for Information only. We do not admit discussion pi racing decisions. G. H. Davison.—Better read the report and the leading article again, and you will find that you support not the Ministry of Transport’s present recommendations but its former views.