Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Kaitoke sails after dispute

. The Union Steam Ship Company’s Kaitoke, which had been delayed at Lyttelton because of a dispute, sailed for Dunedin late yesterday afternoon.

The 3551-ton Kaitoke should have sailed late on Wednesday evening, but according to the company the crew refused to take her

to sea, claiming “hard-lying” compensation—in the form of an accumulated paid day off for every week they served in the ship—because of her age.

The Kaitoke, which had been discharging Australian cargo on Wednesday evening at Lyttelton, was to have over-carried 25 tons of Lyttelton cargo, which would have been sent back from

Dunedin. Because of the delay, the cargo was discharged yesterday morning. Agreement was reached between the Union Steam Ship Company and the men yesterday that their claim would be dealt with on a national basis. The crew agreed to take the ship to sea yesterday morning, and she was programmed to sail at 11 a.m. However, at sailing time the vessel was short of four men, who had presumably gone ashore. They were back yesterday afternoon, and the vessel sailed shortly before 4 p.m. The Kaitoke, although one of the older vessels in the company, is one of the "K” class, engaged in the intercolonial trade. These vessels probably form the backbone of the Union Steam Ship Company’s fleet today. There has been a strong opinion in shipping circles for some time that the “K” class vessels will be among the first to go if the company is reorganised—whether by the P and O Group, the present owner, or by the prospective purchaser, T.N.T. This would affect seamen’s jobs. The secretary of the Lyttelton branch of the Seamen’s Union (Mr J. O’Neil) had no comment to make on the Kaitoke dispute yesterday.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19710806.2.9

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume CXI, Issue 32678, 6 August 1971, Page 1

Word Count
292

Kaitoke sails after dispute Press, Volume CXI, Issue 32678, 6 August 1971, Page 1

Kaitoke sails after dispute Press, Volume CXI, Issue 32678, 6 August 1971, Page 1

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert