Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

State Services rule on prestige awards

The State Services Regulations contained nothing to say that an award of prestige had to relate directly to the work the recipient of the award was doing in his department, said Mr A. Orme, a Maori lawyer employed in the Christchurch Public Trust Office, yesterday.

Mr Orthe, who has been granted a Winston Churchill Fellowship to study race relations overseas, but who has been told that he will not receive leave ’with pay, was making a further reply to the secretary of *the State Services Commission (Mr D. N. Ryan).

Regulation K9O in the State Services Regulations, manual was one of several provisions encouraging employees to apply for awards of prestige, said Mr Orine. It said that if the project was for the good of both the Crown and the employee, the decision for payment of sal-

ary rested with the commission.

Mr Ryan’s suggestion that the commission would not override the Public Trustee’s decision was designed to mislead—and it had misfed the Minister of Maori Affairs (Mr Maclntyre), Mr Orme said. Mr Orme said that in trying to lay the responsibility at the door of the Public Trustee, the commission was being grossly unfair, because it had the final decision, not any departmental head. The source of his salary was immaterial, because ultimately he was paid by the Government

The commission had dozens of precedents, including All Blacks and bandsmen. It could not say it was implementing Government policy, when Government policy clearly recognised the importance of racial relations. His project was aimed solely to help New Zealand in the field of racial relations.

Mr Orme said that he did not intend to continue the debate in public. The matter was now in the hands of the Leader of the Opposition (Mr Kirk).

KAIAPOI LADlES— Bisque bogey—Section 1: Mrs J. Monk, 2 up; Mrs B. Stewart, 1 up; Mrs T. Bate, I up; Mrs B. Pearce, 1 up. Section 2: Mrs F. Mappy. 3 up; Mrs E. Bonner 2 up; Mrs E. Rldout, 2 up: Mrs S. Cairney, 2 up; Mrs B. Woods, 2 up. Section 3: Mrs M. Cleland. 6 up, on count-back from Mrs H. Wilson, 6 up.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19710531.2.138

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume CXI, Issue 32620, 31 May 1971, Page 14

Word Count
367

State Services rule on prestige awards Press, Volume CXI, Issue 32620, 31 May 1971, Page 14

State Services rule on prestige awards Press, Volume CXI, Issue 32620, 31 May 1971, Page 14

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert