Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Medical Benefits

Sir, —Recently a circular letter received from the Social Security Department stated that, being a beneficiary, I was eligible for an increased medical benefit No mention in the circular that the new legislation did not apply to all general practitioners. When I visit my doctor (fee $1.50), I pay $1.50, later receiving a refund warrant for $1.50 (previously 75c). My wife (a beneficiary) visited a different general practitioner whose receptionist stated his fee Was $1.50. I understood from the general practitioner that a non-beneficiary paid 75c from the Social Security Department For the beneficiary, the general practitioner quoted the benefit number and claimed $1.50 from the department and my wife paid 75c, with no refund. If the 75c is not refundable, how does the beneficiary benefit? —Yours, etc., CURIOUS. July 20, 1970. [Mr C. L. Waters, acting registrar of the Social Security Department replies: “When the medical benefits for medical services rendered to certain beneficiaries, pen- . sioners, war veterans, and their dependants was increased from 75 cents to $1.50 this department was asked to issue a certificate to all persons qualified to receive the increased benefit Production of this certificate to a doctor is accepted as evidence of en- ' titlement to the medical benefit, and the doctor claims on ' the Health Department for ' the increased benefit on the patient’s behalf; or if the 1 doctor does not claim but charges the patient his full fee, then the patient should make the claim on the Health I Department The matter of what charge the doctor makes to the patient above the benei fit is, of course, one for agreei ment between the doctor and i the patient.”] '

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19700729.2.108

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume CX, Issue 32361, 29 July 1970, Page 16

Word Count
278

Medical Benefits Press, Volume CX, Issue 32361, 29 July 1970, Page 16

Medical Benefits Press, Volume CX, Issue 32361, 29 July 1970, Page 16

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert