LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Press, Volume CIX, Issue 32252, 21 March 1970, Page 10

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

(1) Letters to be considered for this column must not ex* ceed 150 words They should be on only one side of the paper: preferably typewritten. otherwise clearly written in ink: and ample margins and space between lines should be left for con. venience in sub editing (2) A legible signature and full address—not a P.O box number are required, whether these are to be printed or not. (3) The correspondent must say whether the letter has been or is to be submitted elsewhere. <4) The editor cannot return or keep any letter not accep ted for printing; nor does he undertake to acknow ledge or enter into corres pondence concerning letters, although an acknowledgement will be made where this seems to be necessary or helpful. (5) As a genera! rule correspondence on news items in other publications, or carried on radio and television. Is not acceptable.

K.F.—One man’s meat. . . . Off With Their Tails.—Too

cryptic. Mary McKay.—Your abacus is at fault again. Alex F. Ross.—Exceeds 150 words.

Be Honest. —No space to pursue the subject of the F.O.L.’s interest in Rugby. Well-Bottom Frog.—The item was clearly identified as one man ~ opinion. We have no space to discuss it. Fly.—What do you propose? Do you suggest we do without electricity as well as motorcars? Far-Seeing Lecturer. —You have not been able to see even as far as the rules set out above.

Parents of Four Girls. —It is not an invariable custom; and parents should be frank with their daughters and prospective sons-in-law if they are not in a position to afford expensive wedding ceremonies.