Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Taxation

Sir,—l quite agree with “Lively Lady” when she states that we should strive for “better ways of living." However, to state that the indirect tax (which may come in) would be advantageous to the “privileged” class is sheer nonsense. Admittedly, some may find it harder than others, but paying taxes has the beneficial result known to all. Yet there are no grounds to maintain that the “privileged” class will benefit more than any other class. If this tax is necessary then it will be a move towards “better ways of living” which “Lively Lady" wants and, I am sure, "Housewife” does, too.—Yours, etc., ESTIMATION. August 16, 1968.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19680817.2.74.7

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume CVIII, Issue 31760, 17 August 1968, Page 12

Word Count
108

Taxation Press, Volume CVIII, Issue 31760, 17 August 1968, Page 12

Taxation Press, Volume CVIII, Issue 31760, 17 August 1968, Page 12

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert