Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Pirate Radio

Sir,—The “pirate" radio stations evidently incur your editorial wrath. The sole argument that impresses me is the quality of the proposed programmes. Your legal argument is a hasty motion where angels fear to tread. You imply that the essence of law is authority which is not to be avoided. What about tax avoidance and estate planning? What is the particular law you refer to, anyway? Statutory protection for State monopoly? Is “denationalisation” a taboo subject, illegal in the socialist State? You say none should be allowed ... to compel modification of the law to serve their own ends.” Who wants to modify the law? Certainly not the “pirates.” And what about the recent News Media Ownership lobbying? The test must be the over-all public good.—Yours, etc.. FODIOR. September 9, 1966.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19660910.2.115.6

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume CVI, Issue 31161, 10 September 1966, Page 14

Word Count
131

Pirate Radio Press, Volume CVI, Issue 31161, 10 September 1966, Page 14

Pirate Radio Press, Volume CVI, Issue 31161, 10 September 1966, Page 14

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert