Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

VIEWS ON EROSION

“Silly Letters To Papers” In spite of silly letters to the newspapers. New Zealand was becoming more soil conservation minded, said Mr A. T. Bell, at yesterday's meeting of the North Canterbury Catchment Board. Letters had appeared in the newspapers saying that soil conservation was nonsense. and that there was no erosion, said Mr Bell. These letters had an effect on the public. He was glad to see someone had replied to them, but he wondered whether the board itself should not do more, with greater flexibility for the staff to make replies “Certain professional group: have to put up with silly let ters to the editor almost as stock in trade,” said Dr. W. R. Holmes. He said the board should do as his group did, and appoint someone to male replies. Direct answers, without delay, were required.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19650703.2.64

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume CIV, Issue 30793, 3 July 1965, Page 6

Word Count
142

VIEWS ON EROSION Press, Volume CIV, Issue 30793, 3 July 1965, Page 6

VIEWS ON EROSION Press, Volume CIV, Issue 30793, 3 July 1965, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert