Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Sunday Observance Debate

(N.Z PA.-Reuter—Copyright) LONDON, Feb. 16. Everyone agreed in a House of Commons debate last night that something should be done to brighten up the English Sunday. But at the end of the debate, there was no sign that the Labour Government, any more than its Conservative predecessor, would take early action on such a controversial subject. The first Government speaker, Sir Frank Soskice, the Home Secretary, ridiculed many of the laws and ad-

mitted they were obsolete and unenforceable. I For instance, singing is at- I lowed on Sunday, for that is 1 “music.” If the singer puts i on a false moustache he is taking part in “variety,” 1 which is banned. ! He said there was unlikely 1 to be agreement from every- 1 body since the answers to the ; questions posed would be con- • siderably influenced by deep ’ convictions and habits of mind. ! ! His chief lieutenant. Mr 1 j George Thomas, who would 1 1 carry the burden of making any changes, emphasised all 1 j the difficulties of action in ! ; religious and family life, civil 1 ' liberties and social obliga- ■ "'tions.

Many Sunday observance laws were passed in 1625 to force people to go to church by banning other activities which could interfere. The most effective law regulating Sunday entertainment and sport today is the Sunday Observance Act of 1780 as amended in 1932. It is this statute which bans the opening of public theatres, music and dance halls and the holding of sporting events when charges are made for admission. The House was debating recommendations by a committee which has been studying the problem for three years. The committee urged that

theatres should be open after 12.30 p.m. on Sunday, as well as cinemas. Musical and variety entertainment, fun fairs and circuses, ballet, public dancing and amateur sport should also be fully allowed. Some shopping, particularly for food and drink, would also be a little freer, but in general shops would not open and professional football matches and horseracing were not favoured. The recommendations were not voted on.

Mr Thomas said they would not be put into cold storage, but the question of Sunday was not one on which any Government could act hurriedly or impetuously.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19650217.2.150

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume CIV, Issue 30677, 17 February 1965, Page 13

Word Count
373

Sunday Observance Debate Press, Volume CIV, Issue 30677, 17 February 1965, Page 13

Sunday Observance Debate Press, Volume CIV, Issue 30677, 17 February 1965, Page 13

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert